» Articles » PMID: 34455570

Safety and Effectiveness of Plerixafor for Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Mobilization in Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: Results of a Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

Overview
Date 2021 Aug 29
PMID 34455570
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Plerixafor was approved in Japan in 2016 for peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization in autologous stem cell transplantation (A-SCT).

Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of plerixafor in Japanese patients undergoing A-SCT for various indications in real-world practice.

Patients And Methods: This post-marketing surveillance study included Japanese patients initiating PBSC mobilization with plerixafor for A-SCT. Safety assessments included the incidence of adverse events (AEs) including serious AEs, adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and laboratory variables. Effectiveness assessments were the proportion of patients with the target CD34+ cell yield (≥2 × 10 cells/kg) ≤4 days after plerixafor administration and the number of days required to reach the target CD34+ cell yield.

Results: In total, 785 patients were registered, and the safety and effectiveness analysis sets comprised 764 and 717 patients, respectively. ADRs occurred in 12.2% of patients, with gastrointestinal disorders (5.5%), laboratory investigations (4.5%), and blood and lymphatic system disorders (3.0%) being the most common. A total of 71.1% of patients had the target CD34+ cell yield within ≤4 days of treatment, with a mean (standard deviation) of 1.3 (0.7) days to reach the target CD34+ cell yield. Over 80% of patients with a baseline CD34+ cell count >2 cells/μL had a target CD34+ cell yield within ≤4 days of treatment.

Conclusions: This large post-marketing surveillance study provided real-world evidence detailing the safety and effectiveness of plerixafor for PBSC mobilization in Japanese patients undergoing A-SCT. Importantly, no new safety concerns were identified, and the safety profile of plerixafor was consistent with the established profile of this drug.

References
1.
LaCasce A . Treating Hodgkin lymphoma in the new millennium: Relapsed and refractory disease. Hematol Oncol. 2019; 37 Suppl 1:87-91. DOI: 10.1002/hon.2589. View

2.
Linch D, Winfield D, Goldstone A, Moir D, Hancock B, McMillan A . Dose intensification with autologous bone-marrow transplantation in relapsed and resistant Hodgkin's disease: results of a BNLI randomised trial. Lancet. 1993; 341(8852):1051-4. DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92411-l. View

3.
Bolwell B, Pohlman B, Rybicki L, Sobecks R, Dean R, Curtis J . Patients mobilizing large numbers of CD34+ cells ('super mobilizers') have improved survival in autologous stem cell transplantation for lymphoid malignancies. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2007; 40(5):437-41. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1705763. View

4.
Singh A, Savani B, Albert P, Barrett A . Efficacy of CD34+ stem cell dose in patients undergoing allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation after total body irradiation. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2007; 13(3):339-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2006.10.029. View

5.
Tarella C, Di Nicola M, Caracciolo D, Zallio F, Cuttica A, Omede P . High-dose ara-C with autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell support induces a marked progenitor cell mobilization: an indication for patients at risk for low mobilization. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2002; 30(11):725-32. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703729. View