» Articles » PMID: 34453640

Randomized Phase II Study of CPT-11 Versus PTX Versus Each Combination Chemotherapy with S-1 for Advanced Gastric Cancer That is Refractory to S-1 or S-1 Plus CDDP: OGSG0701

Abstract

Background: To compare irinotecan-alone, paclitaxel-alone, and each combination chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that is refractory to S-1 or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP).

Methods: Patients with AGC after first-line chemotherapy with S-1 or SP, or patients during adjuvant chemotherapy or within 26 weeks after adjuvant chemotherapy completion with S-1 with confirmed disease progression were eligible. Patients were randomly divided into four groups based on treatment: irinotecan-alone (irinotecan; 150 mg/m, day 1, q14 days), paclitaxel-alone (paclitaxel; 80 mg/m, days 1, 8, 15, q28 days), S-1 plus irinotecan (irinotecan; 80 mg/m, days 1, 15, S-1; 80 mg/m, days 1-21, q35 days), and S-1 plus paclitaxel (paclitaxel; 50 mg/m, day1, 8, S-1; 80 mg/m, days 1-14, q21 days). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), response rate, and safety.

Results: From July 2008 to March 2012, 127 patients were enrolled. No difference in median OS was observed in the irinotecan vs. paclitaxel groups or in the monotherapy groups vs. the S-1 combination therapy groups. Median PFS was longer in the paclitaxel group compared with the irinotecan group (4.1 vs. 3.6 months, p = 0.035), although no difference was observed when comparing monotherapy vs. S-1 combination. The most common grade 3 to 4 hematological adverse events were neutropenia with no difference in incidence rate across the treatment groups.

Conclusions: There was no difference in OS between irinotecan and paclitaxel no in OS prolongation of S-1 combination therapy in second-line chemotherapy.

Citing Articles

Efficiency of Protective Interventions on Irinotecan-Induced Diarrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

He Y, Wu L, Qi X, Wang X, He B, Zhang W Integr Cancer Ther. 2024; 23:15347354241242110.

PMID: 38567795 PMC: 10993684. DOI: 10.1177/15347354241242110.


Second- and third-line systemic therapy in patients with advanced esophagogastric cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Ter Veer E, Haj Mohammad N, van Valkenhoef G, Ngai L, Mali R, van Oijen M Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2016; 35(3):439-56.

PMID: 27417221 PMC: 5035657. DOI: 10.1007/s10555-016-9632-2.

References
1.
Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T, Takagane A, Akiya T, Takagi M . S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9(3):215-21. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70035-4. View

2.
Sakuramoto S, Sasako M, Yamaguchi T, Kinoshita T, Fujii M, Nashimoto A . Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine. N Engl J Med. 2007; 357(18):1810-20. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa072252. View

3.
Kodera Y, Ito S, Mochizuki Y, Fujitake S, Koshikawa K, Kanyama Y . A phase II study of weekly paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric Cancer (CCOG0302 study). Anticancer Res. 2007; 27(4C):2667-71. View

4.
Yamaguchi K, Tada M, Horikoshi N, Otani T, Takiuchi H, Saitoh S . Phase II study of paclitaxel with 3-h infusion in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2002; 5(2):90-5. DOI: 10.1007/s101200200015. View

5.
Hironaka S, Zenda S, Boku N, Fukutomi A, Yoshino T, Onozawa Y . Weekly paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2006; 9(1):14-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10120-005-0351-6. View