» Articles » PMID: 34453583

An Ethical Analysis of Divergent Clinical Approaches to the Application of Genetic Testing for Autism and Schizophrenia

Overview
Journal Hum Genet
Specialty Genetics
Date 2021 Aug 28
PMID 34453583
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genetic testing to identify genetic syndromes and copy number variants (CNVs) via whole genome platforms such as chromosome microarray (CMA) or exome sequencing (ES) is routinely performed clinically, and is considered by a variety of organizations and societies to be a "first-tier" test for individuals with developmental delay (DD), intellectual disability (ID), or autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, in the context of schizophrenia, though CNVs can have a large effect on risk, genetic testing is not typically a part of routine clinical care, and no clinical practice guidelines recommend testing. This raises the question of whether CNV testing should be similarly performed for individuals with schizophrenia. Here we consider this proposition in light of the history of genetic testing for ID/DD and ASD, and through the application of an ethical analysis designed to enable robust, accountable and justifiable decision-making. Using a systematic framework and application of relevant bioethical principles (beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, and justice), our examination highlights that while CNV testing for the indication of ID has considerable benefits, there is currently insufficient evidence to suggest that overall, the potential harms are outweighed by the potential benefits of CNV testing for the sole indications of schizophrenia or ASD. However, although the application of CNV tests for children with ASD or schizophrenia without ID/DD is, strictly speaking, off-label use, there may be clinical utility and benefits substantive enough to outweigh the harms. Research is needed to clarify the harms and benefits of testing in pediatric and adult contexts. Given that genetic counseling has demonstrated benefits for schizophrenia, and has the potential to mitigate many of the potential harms from genetic testing, any decisions to implement genetic testing for schizophrenia should involve high-quality evidence-based genetic counseling.

Citing Articles

Application of Genetic Testing for Anorexia Nervosa: An Ethical Analysis.

Ramsay S, Allison K, Temples H, Sarasua S, Boccuto L Brain Behav. 2025; 15(3):e70406.

PMID: 40059471 PMC: 11891269. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70406.


A survey in Austria supports the significance of genetic counseling and pharmacogenetic testing for mental illness.

Aschauer E, Yazdi S, Aschauer H Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1436875.

PMID: 39421071 PMC: 11484073. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1436875.


Updates to the Autism Intervention Research Network on Physical Health (AIR-P) Research Agenda.

Hotez E, Haley M, Martinez-Agosto J, Anderson J, Brown H, Choi K Cureus. 2023; 15(8):e44388.

PMID: 37779815 PMC: 10541233. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44388.


Knowledge, attitudes and experiences of genetic testing for autism spectrum disorders among caregivers, patients, and health providers: A systematic review.

Zhou M, Zhang Y, Li T World J Psychiatry. 2023; 13(5):247-261.

PMID: 37303934 PMC: 10251355. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i5.247.


Increased Prevalence of Rare Copy Number Variants in Treatment-Resistant Psychosis.

Farrell M, Dietterich T, Harner M, Bruno L, Filmyer D, Shaughnessy R Schizophr Bull. 2022; 49(4):881-892.

PMID: 36454006 PMC: 10318882. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbac175.

References
1.
Ackerman M . Genetic purgatory and the cardiac channelopathies: Exposing the variants of uncertain/unknown significance issue. Heart Rhythm. 2015; 12(11):2325-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.07.002. View

2.
Ahn K, Gotay N, Andersen T, Anvari A, Gochman P, Lee Y . High rate of disease-related copy number variations in childhood onset schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2013; 19(5):568-72. PMC: 5157161. DOI: 10.1038/mp.2013.59. View

3.
Almqvist E, Brinkman R, Wiggins S, Hayden M . Psychological consequences and predictors of adverse events in the first 5 years after predictive testing for Huntington's disease. Clin Genet. 2003; 64(4):300-9. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-0004.2003.00157.x. View

4.
Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Dery V . Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age: a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86(4):317-9. PMC: 2647421. DOI: 10.2471/blt.07.050112. View

5.
Baker K, Raymond F, Bass N . Genetic investigation for adults with intellectual disability: opportunities and challenges. Curr Opin Neurol. 2012; 25(2):150-8. DOI: 10.1097/WCO.0b013e328351820e. View