» Articles » PMID: 34452364

Exosome-Based Vaccines: Pros and Cons in the World of Animal Health

Overview
Journal Viruses
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2021 Aug 28
PMID 34452364
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance and new and more complex diseases that affect livestock animal health and food security, the control of epidemics has become a top priority worldwide. Vaccination represents the most important and cost-effective measure to control infectious diseases in animal health, but it represents only 23% of the total global animal health market, highlighting the need to develop new vaccines. A recent strategy in animal health vaccination is the use of extracellular vesicles (EVs), lipid bilayer nanovesicles produced by almost all living cells, including both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. EVs have been evaluated as a prominent source of viral antigens to elicit specific immune responses and to develop new vaccination platforms as viruses and EVs share biogenesis pathways. Preliminary trials with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection (LCMV), porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV), and Marek's disease virus (MDV) have demonstrated that EVs have a role in the activation of cellular and antibody immune responses. Moreover, in parasitic diseases such as (chickens) and (mice) protection has been achieved. Research into EVs is therefore opening an opportunity for new strategies to overcome old problems affecting food security, animal health, and emerging diseases. Here, we review different conventional approaches for vaccine design and compare them with examples of EV-based vaccines that have already been tested in relation to animal health.

Citing Articles

Current Challenges of Vaccination in Fish Health Management.

Kumar A, Middha S, Menon S, Paital B, Gokarn S, Nelli M Animals (Basel). 2024; 14(18).

PMID: 39335281 PMC: 11429256. DOI: 10.3390/ani14182692.


Edible Plant-Derived Extracellular Vesicles for Oral mRNA Vaccine Delivery.

Gai C, Pomatto M, Deregibus M, Dieci M, Piga A, Camussi G Vaccines (Basel). 2024; 12(2).

PMID: 38400183 PMC: 10893065. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines12020200.


Engineered EVs with pathogen proteins: promising vaccine alternatives to LNP-mRNA vaccines.

Zhang B, Sim W, Shen T, Lim S J Biomed Sci. 2024; 31(1):9.

PMID: 38233833 PMC: 10792899. DOI: 10.1186/s12929-024-01000-1.


A Review of Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccine Development in China: Focusing on Safety and Efficacy in Special Populations.

Hu L, Sun J, Wang Y, Tan D, Cao Z, Gao L Vaccines (Basel). 2023; 11(6).

PMID: 37376434 PMC: 10302808. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061045.


Biological Features of Extracellular Vesicles and Challenges.

Zeng Y, Qiu Y, Jiang W, Shen J, Yao X, He X Front Cell Dev Biol. 2022; 10:816698.

PMID: 35813192 PMC: 9263222. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.816698.


References
1.
Mack M, Kleinschmidt A, Bruhl H, Klier C, Nelson P, Cihak J . Transfer of the chemokine receptor CCR5 between cells by membrane-derived microparticles: a mechanism for cellular human immunodeficiency virus 1 infection. Nat Med. 2000; 6(7):769-75. DOI: 10.1038/77498. View

2.
Perry B, Sones K . Science for development. Poverty reduction through animal health. Science. 2007; 315(5810):333-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.1138614. View

3.
Record M, Subra C, Silvente-Poirot S, Poirot M . Exosomes as intercellular signalosomes and pharmacological effectors. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011; 81(10):1171-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2011.02.011. View

4.
Chae C . Commercial PRRS Modified-Live Virus Vaccines. Vaccines (Basel). 2021; 9(2). PMC: 7926738. DOI: 10.3390/vaccines9020185. View

5.
Montaner-Tarbes S, Novell E, Tarancon V, Borras F, Montoya M, Fraile L . Targeted-pig trial on safety and immunogenicity of serum-derived extracellular vesicles enriched fractions obtained from Porcine Respiratory and Reproductive virus infections. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):17487. PMC: 6269534. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-36141-5. View