» Articles » PMID: 34452132

Diverse Effects of Natural and Synthetic Surfactants on the Inhibition of Biofilm

Overview
Journal Pharmaceutics
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Aug 28
PMID 34452132
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A major challenge in the biomedical field is the creation of materials and coating strategies that effectively limit the onset of biofilm-associated infections on medical devices. Biosurfactants are well known and appreciated for their antimicrobial/anti-adhesive/anti-biofilm properties, low toxicity, and biocompatibility. In this study, the rhamnolipid produced by 89 (R89BS) was characterized by HPLC-MS/MS and its ability to modify cell surface hydrophobicity and membrane permeability as well as its antimicrobial, anti-adhesive, and anti-biofilm activity against were compared to two commonly used surfactants of synthetic origin: Tween 80 and Triton X-100. The R89BS crude extract showed a grade of purity of 91.4% and was composed by 70.6% of mono-rhamnolipids and 20.8% of di-rhamnolipids. The biological activities of R89BS towards were higher than those of the two synthetic surfactants. In particular, the anti-adhesive and anti-biofilm properties of R89BS and of its purified mono- and di-congeners were similar. R89BS inhibition of adhesion and biofilm formation was ~97% and 85%, respectively, and resulted in an increased inhibition of about 33% after 6 h and of about 39% after 72 h when compared to their chemical counterparts. These results suggest a possible applicability of R89BS as a protective coating agent to limit implant colonization.

Citing Articles

Investigating the antimicrobial and antibiofilm properties of marine halophilic Bacillus species against ESKAPE pathogens.

Murphy M, Culligan E, Murphy C Environ Microbiol Rep. 2024; 16(5):e70027.

PMID: 39446085 PMC: 11500616. DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.70027.


Synergetic inhibitory effect of isopropyl methylphenol-based agents on biofilm formation by Streptococcus mutans.

Korenaga A, Miyaoka T, Asami H, Yamagami Y, Yoshii M, Tanaka S PLoS One. 2024; 19(9):e0310926.

PMID: 39312550 PMC: 11419349. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310926.


Current Strategies for Combating Biofilm-Forming Pathogens in Clinical Healthcare-Associated Infections.

Biswas R, Jangra B, Ashok G, Ravichandiran V, Mohan U Indian J Microbiol. 2024; 64(3):781-796.

PMID: 39282194 PMC: 11399387. DOI: 10.1007/s12088-024-01221-w.


Biosurfactant complexed with arginine has antibiofilm activity against methicillin-resistant .

Barroso F, da Silva L, Queiroz H, Sa L, da Silva A, da Silva C Future Microbiol. 2024; 19(8):667-679.

PMID: 38864708 PMC: 11259079. DOI: 10.2217/fmb-2023-0271.


Rhamnolipid 89 Biosurfactant Is Effective against Biofilm and Preserves Osteoblast Behavior: Perspectives in Dental Implantology.

Tambone E, Ceresa C, Marchetti A, Chiera S, Anesi A, Nollo G Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(18).

PMID: 37762317 PMC: 10530769. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241814014.


References
1.
Zecconi A, Scali F . Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors in evasion from innate immune defenses in human and animal diseases. Immunol Lett. 2013; 150(1-2):12-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.imlet.2013.01.004. View

2.
Seo Y, Bishop P . Influence of nonionic surfactant on attached biofilm formation and phenanthrene bioavailability during simulated surfactant enhanced bioremediation. Environ Sci Technol. 2007; 41(20):7107-13. DOI: 10.1021/es0701154. View

3.
Zgola-Grzeskowiak A, Kaczorek E . Isolation, preconcentration and determination of rhamnolipids in aqueous samples by dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction and liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. Talanta. 2010; 83(3):744-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2010.10.037. View

4.
Ceresa C, Fracchia L, Williams M, Banat I, Diaz De Rienzo M . The effect of sophorolipids against microbial biofilms on medical-grade silicone. J Biotechnol. 2019; 309:34-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2019.12.019. View

5.
Hajfarajollah H, Eslami P, Mokhtarani B, Noghabi K . Biosurfactants from probiotic bacteria: A review. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2018; 65(6):768-783. DOI: 10.1002/bab.1686. View