» Articles » PMID: 34444300

Patterns of Facial Profile Preference in a Large Sample of Dental Students: A Cross-Sectional Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Aug 27
PMID 34444300
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this study was to explore dental students' facial profile preferences in a large sample of students. Nine hundred and nineteen dental students of four dental schools were involved. As part of a larger study on dentofacial esthetics, six photo series consisting of one unaltered and four altered variants of the same female profile were distributed among the students. The altered features were ones that are esthetically significant according to the literature. The students had to indicate the photo in each series that they preferred. The data were analyzed in a regression model in which preference in the given photo series was the dependent variable and gender, grade of studies, and dental school were the factors. Eight hundred and sixty-one students (93.7%) responded. Gender and dental school were not associated with the observed preferences, but the grade of studies was associated for three of the modified parameters: chin prominence, the sagittal position of the maxillary dental arch, and the simultaneous modification of the prominence of the chin and the nose. This study has confirmed several earlier observations, and new observations have also been made. We have demonstrated that the anteroposterior position of the maxillary incisors may be an important determinant of profile esthetics, even if this position does not influence the situation of the soft tissues and if the forehead cannot be used as a reference. We have also shown that the harmony between the nose and the chin overrides the importance of their individual dimensions.

Citing Articles

[Aesthetic preferences of individuals when evaluating photographs of facial profiles with different sagittal and vertical growth patterns. A cross-sectional study].

Salinas Mendoza G Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2024; 11(4):e174.

PMID: 38312470 PMC: 10831997. DOI: 10.21142/2523-2754-1104-2023-174.

References
1.
Romsics L, Segatto A, Boa K, Becsei R, Rozsa N, Szanto I . Dentofacial mini- and microesthetics as perceived by dental students: A cross-sectional multi-site study. PLoS One. 2020; 15(3):e0230182. PMC: 7067484. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230182. View

2.
Naini F, Manouchehri S, Al-Bitar Z, Gill D, Garagiola U, Wertheim D . The maxillary incisor labial face tangent: clinical evaluation of maxillary incisor inclination in profile smiling view and idealized aesthetics. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019; 41(1):31. PMC: 6701796. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-019-0214-4. View

3.
Chen Y, Cheng Y, Cheng H, Yu H . Comparison of smile esthetics among celebrities, dentists, and dental students in a Han Chinese population. J Prosthet Dent. 2019; 123(6):845-849. DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.08.014. View

4.
Andrews W . AP relationship of the maxillary central incisors to the forehead in adult white females. Angle Orthod. 2008; 78(4):662-9. DOI: 10.2319/0003-3219(2008)078[0662:AROTMC]2.0.CO;2. View

5.
Soh J, Chew M, Wong H . A comparative assessment of the perception of Chinese facial profile esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 127(6):692-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.02.018. View