» Articles » PMID: 34443112

Sustainable Surface Modification of Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Implants by Hydroxyapatite/Silica Coating-An In Vivo Animal Study

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Aug 27
PMID 34443112
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) has the potential to overcome some of the disadvantages of titanium interbody implants in anterior cervical and discectomy and fusion (ACDF). However, PEEK shows an inferior biological behavior regarding osseointegration and bioactivity. Therefore, the aim of the study was to create a bioactive surface coating on PEEK implants with a unique nanopore structure enabling the generation of a long-lasting interfacial composite layer between coating material and implant. Seventy-two PEEK implants-each thirty-six pure PEEK implants (PI) and thirty-six PEEK implants with a sprayed coating consisting of nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (ncHA) embedded in a silica matrix and interfacial composite layer (SPI)-were inserted in the femoral condyles of adult rats using a split-side model. After 2, 4 and 8 weeks, the femur bones were harvested. Half of the femur bones were used in histological and histomorphometrical analyses. Additionally, pull-out tests were performed in the second half. Postoperative healing was uneventful for all animals, and no postoperative complications were observed. Considerable crestal and medullary bone remodeling could be found around all implants, with faster bone formation around the SPI and fewer regions with fibrous tissue barriers between implant and bone. Histomorphometrical analyses showed a higher bone to implant contact (BIC) in SPI after 4 and 8 weeks ( < 0.05). Pull-out tests revealed higher pull-out forces in SPI at all time points ( < 0.01). The presented findings demonstrate that a combination of a bioactive coating and the permanent chemical and structural modified interfacial composite layer can improve bone formation at the implant surface by creating a sustainable bone-implant interface. This might be a promising way to overcome the bioinert surface property of PEEK-based implants.

Citing Articles

Nano-Based Approaches in Surface Modifications of Dental Implants: A Literature Review.

Marasli C, Katifelis H, Gazouli M, Lagopati N Molecules. 2024; 29(13.

PMID: 38999015 PMC: 11243276. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29133061.


Safety and Efficacy of Zero-Profile Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Cages Filled with Biphasic Calcium Phosphate (BCP) in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Case Series.

Battistelli M, Mazzucchi E, Muselli M, Galieri G, Polli F, Pignotti F J Clin Med. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38610684 PMC: 11012624. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13071919.


Surface modification of PEEK implants for craniofacial reconstruction and aesthetic augmentation-fiction or reality?.

Kauke-Navarro M, Knoedler L, Knoedler S, Deniz C, Safi A Front Surg. 2024; 11:1351749.

PMID: 38481611 PMC: 10936457. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1351749.


Precision of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) or cobalt-chrome implant bar fit to implants after mechanical cycling.

Silva Junior E, Basting R, Turssi C, Franca F Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2023; 36(2):71-77.

PMID: 37776503 PMC: 10557084. DOI: 10.54589/aol.36/2/71.


Latest advances: Improving the anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties of PEEK materials.

Zhang Z, Zhang X, Zheng Z, Xin J, Han S, Qi J Mater Today Bio. 2023; 22:100748.

PMID: 37600350 PMC: 10432209. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2023.100748.


References
1.
Sengupta P . The Laboratory Rat: Relating Its Age With Human's. Int J Prev Med. 2013; 4(6):624-30. PMC: 3733029. View

2.
Najeeb S, Zafar M, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F . Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2015; 60(1):12-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001. View

3.
Ng A, Tan K, Phang M, Aziyati O, Tan G, Isa M . Differential osteogenic activity of osteoprogenitor cells on HA and TCP/HA scaffold of tissue engineered bone. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007; 85(2):301-12. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.31324. View

4.
Xu W, Holzhuter G, Sorg H, Wolter D, Lenz S, Gerber T . Early matrix change of a nanostructured bone grafting substitute in the rat. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2009; 91(2):692-699. DOI: 10.1002/jbm.b.31445. View

5.
Mobbs R, Phan K, Assem Y, Pelletier M, Walsh W . Combination Ti/PEEK ALIF cage for anterior lumbar interbody fusion: Early clinical and radiological results. J Clin Neurosci. 2016; 34:94-99. DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.05.028. View