» Articles » PMID: 34434960

Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: A Tertiary Care Academic Center Experience

Overview
Journal Front Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2021 Aug 26
PMID 34434960
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Pilonidal disease (PD) represents one of the most common proctological diseases in young adults. Although several approaches to treating PD have been described, there is still a lack of agreement on which is the best. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term efficacy of endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) at a tertiary care academic center. Between June 2017 and January 2021, a total of 32 patients [12 women (37.5%) and 20 men (62.5%)] with a mean age of 29.22 ± 12.98 years were treated with EPSiT. Pre- and post-operative symptoms were assessed with a score of 0-5. Success was defined as the absence of any subjective symptoms, as well as by complete post-operative wound healing. Most of the patients had a midline external opening (17/32; 53.1%), with a mean number of external openings of 2.41 (1-4) ± 1.04. The median post-operative pain score was 0, and the mean follow-up period was 22 (4-42) ± 11.49 months. The time to wound healing was reduced in patients with one opening (28.14 ± 4.06 days) compared to patients with two or more openings (33.64 ± 7.3 days) ( = 0.067). The mean operative time was longer in patients who subsequently had a recurrence (41.75 ± 6.24 vs. 34.18 ± 6.24 min; = 0.031). The overall success rate was 87.5% (28/32), and the mean time to recurrence was 3.25 (2-5) ± 1.26 months. EPSiT represents a viable option for the treatment of PD. More evidence and a longer follow-up period are needed to validate the results.

Citing Articles

Treatment options for patients with pilonidal sinus disease: PITSTOP, a mixed-methods evaluation.

Brown S, Hind D, Strong E, Bradburn M, Din F, Lee E Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(33):1-113.

PMID: 39045854 PMC: 11284621. DOI: 10.3310/KFDQ2017.


Five-year recurrence after endoscopic approach to pilonidal sinus disease: A multicentre experience.

Manigrasso M, DAmore A, Benatti E, Bracchitta L, Bracchitta S, Cantarella F Tech Coloproctol. 2023; 27(10):929-935.

PMID: 37597082 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-023-02846-7.


Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment: Preliminary Results, Learning Curve and Comparison with Standard Open Approach.

Parente G, Ruspi F, Thomas E, Di Mitri M, Cravano S, DAntonio S Children (Basel). 2023; 10(6).

PMID: 37371294 PMC: 10297686. DOI: 10.3390/children10061063.


Effect of sinus resection combined with vacuum-assisted closure on sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.

Liu X, Zhao X, Shen G, Fan S, Xu J, Fan Z Int Wound J. 2023; 20(9):3474-3482.

PMID: 37218401 PMC: 10588358. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14218.


Endoscopic approach to complex or recurrent pilonidal sinus: A retrospective analysis.

Maione F, DAmore A, Milone M, Vertaldi S, Anoldo P, Chini A Int Wound J. 2022; 20(4):1212-1218.

PMID: 36271666 PMC: 10031245. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13980.


References
1.
Gecim I, Goktug U, Celasin H . Endoscopic Pilonidal Sinus Treatment Combined With Crystalized Phenol Application May Prevent Recurrence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2017; 60(4):405-407. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000778. View

2.
Milone M, Sosa Fernandez L, Musella M, Milone F . Safety and Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Video-Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2016; 151(6):547-53. DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.5233. View

3.
Strong E, Callaghan T, Beal E, Moffatt C, Wickramasekera N, Brown S . Patient decision-making and regret in pilonidal sinus surgery: a mixed-methods study. Colorectal Dis. 2021; 23(6):1487-1498. DOI: 10.1111/codi.15606. View

4.
Karydakis G . Easy and successful treatment of pilonidal sinus after explanation of its causative process. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992; 62(5):385-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1992.tb07208.x. View

5.
Meinero P, La Torre M, Lisi G, Stazi A, Carbone A, Regusci L . Endoscopic pilonidal sinus treatment (EPSiT) in recurrent pilonidal disease: a prospective international multicenter study. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019; 34(4):741-746. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-019-03256-8. View