» Articles » PMID: 34431990

Predictive Accuracy and Densitometric Analysis of Point-of-Care Immunoassay for Adenoviral Conjunctivitis

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate diagnosis of adenoviral conjunctivitis (Ad-Cs) is important for timely and appropriate patient management to reduce disease transmission. This study assessed the diagnostic accuracy of a commercially available point-of-care adenovirus immunoassay and determined whether its predictive accuracy is influenced by signal intensities of test result bands.

Methods: Point-of-care immunoassay (AdenoPlus) testing and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) testing was performed on conjunctival swab samples obtained from eyes of 186 eligible adult participants with presumed infectious conjunctivitis and symptoms of ≤4 days. Masked observers assessed signal intensities of the immunoassay test and control bands using densitometry.

Results: Ad-Cs was confirmed by qPCR in 28 of the 56 eyes that tested positive on the AdenoPlus, a 50% positive predictive value (95% confidence interval [CI] = 36.9, 63.1). No adenovirus was detected by qPCR in 128 of 130 eyes that tested negative on AdenoPlus, a 98.5% negative predictive value (CI = 96.3, 100). Sensitivity and specificity were 93% (CI = 84.4, 100) and 82% (CI = 76.0, 88.1), respectively. Viral titers significantly correlated with ratio of test band signal intensities (R2 = 0.32, P = 0.002). Higher positive predictive value was associated with higher densitometry ratios (receiver operating characteristic [ROC] area = 0.71; 95% CI = 0.59, 0.83).

Conclusions: Densitometric analyses suggest that the diagnostic accuracy of AdenoPlus is influenced by the signal intensity of the test result bands. Visual comparison of the test band intensities by clinicians could reduce the false positive rate of point-of-care immunoassays and aid in the diagnosis of viral infections.

Translational Relevance: Ratiometric densitometry of point-of-care immunoassays could aid clinicians' decision making in diagnosing infectious diseases, including Ad-Cs.

Citing Articles

Natural history of adenoviral conjunctivitis in a US-based population: Viral load, signs, and symptoms.

Harthan J, Than T, Shorter E, Hartwick A, Morettin C, Huecker J Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2024; 47(2):102110.

PMID: 38171995 PMC: 10960668. DOI: 10.1016/j.clae.2023.102110.


Case Series: Unbiased Deep Sequencing Analysis of Acute Infectious Conjunctivitis in an Ambulatory Eye Center in Berkeley, California.

Kanai K, Whiteside M, Wong M, La T, Nassiri M, Lee S Optom Vis Sci. 2023; 100(4):276-280.

PMID: 36880993 PMC: 10133203. DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0000000000002010.

References
1.
Jhanji V, Chan T, Li E, Agarwal K, Vajpayee R . Adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2015; 60(5):435-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2015.04.001. View

2.
Dart J . Eye disease at a community health centre. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986; 293(6560):1477-80. PMC: 1342247. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.293.6560.1477. View

3.
Sambursky R, Trattler W, Tauber S, Starr C, Friedberg M, Boland T . Sensitivity and specificity of the AdenoPlus test for diagnosing adenoviral conjunctivitis. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2013; 131(1):17-22. DOI: 10.1001/2013.jamaophthalmol.513. View

4.
Koczula K, Gallotta A . Lateral flow assays. Essays Biochem. 2016; 60(1):111-20. PMC: 4986465. DOI: 10.1042/EBC20150012. View

5.
Woodland R, Darougar S, Thaker U, Cornell L, Siddique M, Wania J . Causes of conjunctivitis and keratoconjunctivitis in Karachi, Pakistan. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1992; 86(3):317-20. DOI: 10.1016/0035-9203(92)90328-a. View