Molecular Mechanics Calculations of DA12.dT12 and of the Curved Molecule D(GCTCGAAAAA)4.d(TTTTTCGAGC)4

Overview

Journal Eur Biophys J

Specialty Biophysics

Date 1987 Jan 1

PMID 3443078

Citations 12

Authors

E Von Kitzing

S Diekmann

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Using the AMBER software package (Weiner and Kollman 1981) substantially modified for electrostatic contributions, the structural energies of the double-stranded oligonucleotides dA12.dT12 and d(GCTCGAAAAA)4.d(TTTTTCGAGC)4 were minimized. Using various starting structures for the molecule dA12.dT12, one final structure is obtained which possesses the experimentally determined properties of poly(dA).poly(dT). This structure is an A-form-B-form-hybrid structure similar to that of Arnott et al. (1983). The dA-strand is similar to an A-form while the dT-strand is similar to normal B-form. This structure and separately optimized B-form sequence stretches were used to construct the double-stranded fragment d(GCTCGAAAAA)4 which again was optimized. This sequence, when imbedded in a DNA fragment as contiguous repeats, shows a gel migration anomaly which has been interpreted as stable curvature of the DNA (Diekmann 1986). The calculated structure of this sequence indeed has a curved helix axis and is discussed as a model for curved DNA. A theoretical formalism is presented which allows one to calculate the structural parameters of any nucleic acid double helix in two different geometrical representations. This formalism is used to determine the parameters of the base-pair orientations of the curved structure in terms of wedge as well as cylindrical parameters. In the structural model presented here, the curvature of the helix axis results from an alternation of two different DNA structures in which the base-pairs possess different angles with the helix axis ('cylinder tilt'). Resulting from geometric restraints, a negative cylinder tilt angle correlates strongly with the closing of the minor groove ('wedge roll'). The blocks with different structure are not exactly coincident with the dA5-blocks and the B-DNA stretches. Within the dA5 block, base-pair tilt and wedge roll adopt large values which proceed into the 3' flanking B-DNA sequence by about one base-pair. These properties of the structure calculated here are discussed in terms of different models explaining DNA curvature.

Citing Articles

Molecular modeling of nucleic acid structure: electrostatics and solvation.

Cheatham 3rd T, Brooks B, Kollman P Curr Protoc Nucleic Acid Chem. 2008; Chapter 7:Unit 7.9.

PMID: 18428877 PMC: 4091950. DOI: 10.1002/0471142700.nc0709s05.

Magnitude and direction of DNA bending induced by screw-axis orientation: influence of sequence, mismatches and abasic sites.

Curuksu J, Zakrzewska K, Zacharias M Nucleic Acids Res. 2008; 36(7):2268-83.

PMID: 18287117 PMC: 2367702. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkm1135.

Comparison of rotation models for describing DNA conformations: application to static and polymorphic forms.

Mazur J, Jernigan R Biophys J. 1995; 68(4):1472-89.

PMID: 7787033 PMC: 1282042. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(95)80320-6.

Parallel stranded duplex DNA.

Ramsing N, Jovin T Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 16(14A):6659-76.

PMID: 3399411 PMC: 338321. DOI: 10.1093/nar/16.14.6659.

Definitions and nomenclature of nucleic acid structure components.

DICKERSON R Nucleic Acids Res. 1989; 17(5):1797-803.

PMID: 2928107 PMC: 317523. DOI: 10.1093/nar/17.5.1797.

References

Trifonov E . Curved DNA. CRC Crit Rev Biochem. 1985; 19(2):89-106. DOI: 10.3109/10409238509082540. View

PRUNELL A . Nucleosome reconstitution on plasmid-inserted poly(dA) . poly(dT). EMBO J. 1982; 1(2):173-9. PMC: 553016. DOI: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01143.x. View

Soumpasis D . Statistical mechanics of the B----Z transition of DNA: contribution of diffuse ionic interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984; 81(16):5116-20. PMC: 391648. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.81.16.5116. View

Hagerman P . Sequence dependence of the curvature of DNA: a test of the phasing hypothesis. Biochemistry. 1985; 24(25):7033-7. DOI: 10.1021/bi00346a001. View

Fratini A, Kopka M, Drew H, DICKERSON R . Reversible bending and helix geometry in a B-DNA dodecamer: CGCGAATTBrCGCG. J Biol Chem. 1982; 257(24):14686-707. View

Griffith J, Bleyman M, Rauch C, Kitchin P, Englund P . Visualization of the bent helix in kinetoplast DNA by electron microscopy. Cell. 1986; 46(5):717-24. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90347-8. View

Bubienko E, Cruz P, Thomason J, Borer P . Nearest-neighbor effects in the structure and function of nucleic acids. Prog Nucleic Acid Res Mol Biol. 1983; 30:41-90. DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60683-2. View

Ulanovsky L, Bodner M, Trifonov E, Choder M . Curved DNA: design, synthesis, and circularization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986; 83(4):862-6. PMC: 322970. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.83.4.862. View

Wartell R, Harrell J . Characteristics and variations of B-type DNA conformations in solution: a quantitative analysis of Raman band intensities of eight DNAs. Biochemistry. 1986; 25(9):2664-71. DOI: 10.1021/bi00357a056. View

10.

Diekmann S, Wang J . On the sequence determinants and flexibility of the kinetoplast DNA fragment with abnormal gel electrophoretic mobilities. J Mol Biol. 1985; 186(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90251-7. View

11.

Sarma M, Gupta G, Sarma R . Untenability of the heteronomous DNA model for poly(dA).poly(dT) in solution. This DNA adopts a right-handed B-DNA duplex in which the two strands are conformationally equivalent. A 500 MHz NMR study using one dimensional NOE. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1985; 2(6):1057-84. DOI: 10.1080/07391102.1985.10507624. View

12.

Kunkel G, Martinson H . Nucleosomes will not form on double-stranded RNa or over poly(dA).poly(dT) tracts in recombinant DNA. Nucleic Acids Res. 1981; 9(24):6869-88. PMC: 327648. DOI: 10.1093/nar/9.24.6869. View

13.

Haran T, Shakked Z . Base-stacking interactions in double-helical DNA structures: experiment versus theory. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1984; 2(2):397-412. DOI: 10.1080/07391102.1984.10507575. View

14.

Selsing E, Wells R, Alden C, Arnott S . Bent DNA: visualization of a base-paired and stacked A-B conformational junction. J Biol Chem. 1979; 254(12):5417-22. View

15.

Singh U, Weiner S, Kollman P . Molecular dynamics simulations of d(C-G-C-G-A) X d(T-C-G-C-G) with and without "hydrated" counterions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985; 82(3):755-9. PMC: 397125. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.82.3.755. View

16.

Strauss F, Gaillard C, PRUNELL A . Helical periodicity of DNA, Poly(dA) . poly(dT) and poly(dA-dT). poly(dA-dT) in solution. Eur J Biochem. 1981; 118(2):215-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1981.tb06389.x. View

17.

Marini J, Levene S, Crothers D, Englund P . Bent helical structure in kinetoplast DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1982; 79(24):7664-8. PMC: 347408. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.79.24.7664. View

18.

Peck L, Wang J . Sequence dependence of the helical repeat of DNA in solution. Nature. 1981; 292(5821):375-8. DOI: 10.1038/292375a0. View

19.

Arnott S, Hukins D . Optimised parameters for A-DNA and B-DNA. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1972; 47(6):1504-9. DOI: 10.1016/0006-291X(72)90243-4. View

20.

PRUNELL A, Goulet I, Jacob Y, Goutorbe F . The smaller helical repeat of poly(dA) . poly(dT) relative to DNA may reflect the wedge property of the dA . dT base pair. Eur J Biochem. 1984; 138(2):253-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1984.tb07909.x. View