» Articles » PMID: 34423161

Prophylactic Colectomy for Children with Familial Adenomatous Polyposis: Resource Utilization and Outcomes for Open and Laparoscopic Surgery

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic approach for the surgical management of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) has become increasingly common for pediatric patients. The purpose of this study was to compare short-term outcomes and resource utilization between open and laparoscopic surgery for prophylactic colectomy in children with FAP.

Methods: The Kids' Inpatient Database (2009 and 2012) was analyzed for children (age ≤20 years) with FAP that underwent prophylactic total colectomy or proctocolectomy. Patient demographics, treating hospital characteristics, hospital charges, and short-term outcomes were compared according to the surgical technique utilized (open versus laparoscopic).

Results: Overall, we identified 216 patients with FAP that underwent elective total colectomy, of which 95 cases were performed by open surgery and 121 were done laparoscopically. The majority of patients were treated at large, not-for-profit, urban teaching hospitals, and the median age was equal (16 years) in both groups. Complications that were more common for open procedures included accidental perforation or hemorrhage (4% 0%, P=0.023), reopening of surgical site (3% 0%, P=0.049), and pneumonia (3% 0%, P=0.049). Simultaneous proctectomy was performed more commonly in the open cohort (91% 71%, P<0.001) as well as ileostomy creation (74% 49%, P<0.001). The median length of stay was similar in the open and laparoscopic groups (7 6 days, P=0.712). Median total hospital charges were also similar ($67,334 $68,717, P=0.080).

Conclusions: A laparoscopic approach for prophylactic colectomy can be safely performed in children with FAP, and total hospital charges are equivalent compared to open surgery. However, simultaneous proctectomy was performed less often with laparoscopic surgery.

References
1.
Fleming F, Francone T, Kim M, Gunzler D, Messing S, Monson J . A laparoscopic approach does reduce short-term complications in patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2011; 54(2):176-82. DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181fb4232. View

2.
McKenna N, Potter D, Bews K, Glasgow A, Mathis K, Habermann E . Ileal-pouch anal anastomosis in pediatric NSQIP: Does a laparoscopic approach reduce complications and length of stay?. J Pediatr Surg. 2018; 54(1):112-117. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.10.005. View

3.
McNicol F, Kennedy R, Phillips R, Clark S . Laparoscopic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (IRA), supported by an enhanced recovery programme in cases of familial adenomatous polyposis. Colorectal Dis. 2011; 14(4):458-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02683.x. View

4.
Vitellaro M, Bonfanti G, Sala P, Poiasina E, Barisella M, Signoroni S . Laparoscopic colectomy and restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Surg Endosc. 2010; 25(6):1866-75. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-010-1478-z. View

5.
Kiran R, da Luz Moreira A, Remzi F, Church J, Lavery I, Hammel J . Factors associated with septic complications after restorative proctocolectomy. Ann Surg. 2010; 251(3):436-40. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cf8814. View