» Articles » PMID: 34420040

I, Robot: Depression Plays Different Roles in Human-human and Human-robot Interactions

Overview
Date 2021 Aug 22
PMID 34420040
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Socially engaging robots have been increasingly applied to alleviate depressive symptoms and to improve the quality of social life among different populations. Seeing that depression negatively influences social reward processing in everyday interaction, we investigate this influence during simulated interactions with humans or robots. In this study, 35 participants with mild depression and 35 controls (all from nonclinical populations) finished the social incentive delay task with event-related potential recording, in which they received performance feedback from other persons or from a robot. Compared to the controls, the mild depressive symptom (MDS) group represented abnormalities of social reward processing in the human feedback condition: first, the MDS group showed a lower hit rate and a smaller contingent-negative variation (correlated with each other) during reward anticipation; second, depression level modulated both the early phase (indexed by the feedback-related negativity (FRN)) and the late phase (indexed by the P3) of reward consumption. In contrast, the effect of depression was evident only on FRN amplitude in the robot feedback condition. We suggest that compared to human-human interaction, the rewarding properties of human-robot interaction are less likely to be affected by depression. These findings have implications for the utilization of robot-assisted intervention in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Aberrant high-beta band functional connectivity during reward processing in melancholic major depressive disorder: An MEG study.

Zhang Q, Du Y, Bao C, Hua L, Yan R, Dai Z Neuroimage Clin. 2024; 43:103666.

PMID: 39232415 PMC: 11404173. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103666.

References
1.
Chaminade T, Okka M . Comparing the effect of humanoid and human face for the spatial orientation of attention. Front Neurorobot. 2013; 7:12. PMC: 3759784. DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00012. View

2.
WALTER W, Cooper R, ALDRIDGE V, MCCALLUM W, Winter A . CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION: AN ELECTRIC SIGN OF SENSORIMOTOR ASSOCIATION AND EXPECTANCY IN THE HUMAN BRAIN. Nature. 1964; 203:380-4. DOI: 10.1038/203380a0. View

3.
Knutson B, Westdorp A, Kaiser E, Hommer D . FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task. Neuroimage. 2000; 12(1):20-7. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0593. View

4.
Gehring W, Willoughby A . The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science. 2002; 295(5563):2279-82. DOI: 10.1126/science.1066893. View

5.
Little A, Jones B, DeBruine L . The many faces of research on face perception. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011; 366(1571):1634-7. PMC: 3130382. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0386. View