» Articles » PMID: 34418072

The Biological Index of Frailty: A New Index for the Assessment of Frailty in Human Skeletal Remains

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 2021 Aug 21
PMID 34418072
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Frailty is the physiological stress that individuals suffer during their life. In past populations, frailty is conventionally assessed through the occurrence of different biomarkers of biological stress. Some efforts have been made to propose indexes that combine all biomarkers. However, these indices have some critical limitations: they cannot be used on incomplete skeletons, do not consider the severity and/or healing of lesions, and assign equal importance to different biomarkers. To address these limitations, we propose a new index to assess frailty in skeletal individuals.

Material And Methods: By statistically analyzing a large amount of osteological data available from the Museum of London, and using a Logit model, we were able to define a different weight for each reported biomarker of frailty, based on their importance in increasing the risk of premature death for the individuals.

Results: The biological index of frailty (BIF) is the weighted mean of all biomarkers scored on the individuals, according to a different degree of importance assigned to each one. It also considers the severity and healing of the biomarkers when this is relevant to diagnose frailty. We applied BIF on a sample of Monastics and Non-Monastics from medieval England and compared it with the skeletal index of frailty (SFI).

Discussion: BIF is the first frailty index that gives a different weight to each skeletal biomarker of stress, considers both severity and healing of the lesions, and can be applied on partial skeletal remains. The comparison with SFI showed that BIF is applicable to a larger number of skeletal individuals, revealing new differences between the Monastic and the Non-Monastic groups.

Citing Articles

Comparative lifespan and healthspan of nonhuman primate species common to biomedical research.

Huber H, Ainsworth H, Quillen E, Salmon A, Ross C, Azhar A Geroscience. 2024; 47(1):135-151.

PMID: 39585646 PMC: 11872815. DOI: 10.1007/s11357-024-01421-8.


Frailty or resilience? Hazard-based and cumulative phenotype approaches to discerning signals of health inequality in medieval London.

Yaussy S, Marklein K, DeWitte S, Crews D Sci Adv. 2024; 10(46):eadq5703.

PMID: 39536101 PMC: 11559611. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adq5703.


Medieval monastic health: Variation in skeletal signs of inflammation and developmental stress between religious orders in London.

DeWitte S Am J Hum Biol. 2024; 36(12):e24052.

PMID: 38351667 PMC: 11323240. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.24052.


Skeletal Markers of Physiological Stress as Indicators of Structural Violence: A Comparative Study between the Deceased Migrants of the Mediterranean Sea and the CAL Milano Cemetery Skeletal Collection.

Biehler-Gomez L, Palamenghi A, Baudu M, Caccia G, Attisano G, Gibelli D Biology (Basel). 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36829611 PMC: 9953607. DOI: 10.3390/biology12020335.


Beyond the report: Prospects and challenges in forensic anthropological investigations of structural vulnerability.

Gruenthal-Rankin A, Somogyi T, Roome A, DiGangi E Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2023; 6:100315.

PMID: 36793704 PMC: 9923155. DOI: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100315.