» Articles » PMID: 34415982

'Seeing' Proximal Representations: Testing Attitudes to the Relationship Between Vision and Images

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Aug 20
PMID 34415982
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Corrections applied by the visual system, like size constancy, provide us with a coherent and stable perspective from ever-changing retinal images. In the present experiment we investigated how willing adults are to examine their own vision as if it were an uncorrected 2D image, much like a photograph. We showed adult participants two lines on a wall, both of which were the same length but one was closer to the participant and hence appeared visually longer. Despite the instruction to base their judgements on appearance specifically, approximately half of the participants judged the lines to appear the same. When they took a photo of the lines and were asked how long they appeared in the image their responses shifted; now the closer line appeared longer. However, when they were asked again about their own view they reverted to their original response. These results suggest that many adults are resistant to imagining their own vision as if it were a flat image. We also place these results within the context of recent views on visual perspective-taking.

Citing Articles

It's Not You, It's Me: A Review of Individual Differences in Visuospatial Perspective Taking.

Samuel S, Cole G, Eacott M Perspect Psychol Sci. 2022; 18(2):293-308.

PMID: 35994772 PMC: 10018059. DOI: 10.1177/17456916221094545.

References
1.
Granrud C, Schmechel T . Development of size constancy in children: a test of the proximal mode sensitivity hypothesis. Percept Psychophys. 2007; 68(8):1372-81. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193736. View

2.
Cole G, Millett A, Samuel S, Eacott M . Perspective-Taking: In Search of a Theory. Vision (Basel). 2020; 4(2). PMC: 7355554. DOI: 10.3390/vision4020030. View

3.
Bertamini M, Soranzo A . Reasoning About Visibility in Mirrors: A Comparison Between a Human Observer and a Camera. Perception. 2018; 47(8):821-832. DOI: 10.1177/0301006618781088. View

4.
Perdreau F, Cavanagh P . Do artists see their retinas?. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012; 5:171. PMC: 3248676. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00171. View

5.
Shallo J, Rock I . Size constancy in children: a new interpretation. Perception. 1988; 17(6):803-13. DOI: 10.1068/p170803. View