» Articles » PMID: 34412033

Feasibility and Preliminary Efficacy of a Multimodal Approach to Increase Physical Activity in Older Adults With Memory Complaints: The Education for Action Study

Overview
Specialty Geriatrics
Date 2021 Aug 19
PMID 34412033
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this randomized controlled pilot trial, the authors explored the feasibility, technology compliance, and preliminary efficacy of the Education for Action (EDU-ACT), a multimodal intervention combining evidence-based strategies of physical activity (PA) education and coaching in PA levels over 4 weeks between EDU-ACT and control groups. The authors also assessed pre-post changes in neurocognitive function, functional mobility and dual-task performance, sleep and quality of life. Thirty-two sedentary older adults with memory complaints (age = 66 ± 5.3) completed the study (EDU-ACT = 18 and control = 14). The EDU-ACT adherence rate was 95%, and compliance of daily PA reporting was, on average, 22.7 days (94.6%). The EDU-ACT group demonstrated a significantly greater number of steps, processing speed, and dual-task performance when compared with controls (p < .05). In this study, a multimodal, evidence-based, low-cost intervention was feasible, well-accepted, with high adherence and compliance rates, and effective at promoting clinically meaningful increases in PA, for at least 1 month postintervention, in older adults with memory complaints.

Citing Articles

Recommending Physical Activity to Your Aging Patients? What Clinicians Need to Know to Increase Adherence From the Older Adult Perspective.

Cabral D, Santos V, Silva M, Leite G, Mesquita A, Pascual-Leone A Front Rehabil Sci. 2022; 3:923221.

PMID: 36189000 PMC: 9397884. DOI: 10.3389/fresc.2022.923221.


Aging in the Digital Age: Using Technology to Increase the Reach of the Clinician Expert and Close the Gap Between Health Span and Life Span.

Gomes-Osman J, Solana-Sanchez J, Rogers E, Cattaneo G, Souillard-Mandar W, Bates D Front Digit Health. 2021; 3:755008.

PMID: 34870269 PMC: 8639502. DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.755008.

References
1.
Crouter S, Schneider P, Karabulut M, Bassett Jr D . Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003; 35(8):1455-60. DOI: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078932.61440.A2. View

2.
Stathi A, Withall J, Thompson J, Davis M, Gray S, de Koning J . Feasibility Trial Evaluation of a Peer Volunteering Active Aging Intervention: ACE (Active, Connected, Engaged). Gerontologist. 2019; 60(3):571-582. PMC: 7117619. DOI: 10.1093/geront/gnz003. View

3.
Zubala A, MacGillivray S, Frost H, Kroll T, Skelton D, Gavine A . Promotion of physical activity interventions for community dwelling older adults: A systematic review of reviews. PLoS One. 2017; 12(7):e0180902. PMC: 5507305. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180902. View

4.
Shields C, Fowles J, Dunbar P, Barron B, McQuaid S, Dillman C . Increasing diabetes educators' confidence in physical activity and exercise counselling: the effectiveness of the "physical activity and exercise toolkit" training intervention. Can J Diabetes. 2013; 37(6):381-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.08.265. View

5.
Vaara J, Vasankari T, Koski H, Kyrolainen H . Awareness and Knowledge of Physical Activity Recommendations in Young Adult Men. Front Public Health. 2019; 7:310. PMC: 6831523. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00310. View