» Articles » PMID: 34407068

Sexual, Allometric and Forest Cover Effects on Giant Anteaters' Movement Ecology

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Aug 18
PMID 34407068
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Knowing the influence of intrinsic and environmental traits on animals' movement is a central interest of ecology and can aid to enhance management decisions. The giant anteater (Myrmecophaga tridactyla) is a vulnerable mammal that presents low capacity for physiological thermoregulation and uses forests as thermal shelters. Here, we aim to provide reliable estimates of giant anteaters' movement patterns and home range size, as well as untangle the role of intrinsic and environmental drivers on their movement. We GPS-tracked 19 giant anteaters in Brazilian savannah. We used a continuous-time movement model to estimate their movement patterns (described by home range crossing time, daily distance moved and directionality), and provide an autocorrelated kernel density estimate of home range size. Then, we used mixed structural equations to integratively model the effects of sex, body mass and proportion of forest cover on movement patterns and home range size, considering the complex net of interactions between these variables. Male giant anteaters presented more intensive space use and larger home range than females with similar body mass, as it is expected in polygynous social mating systems. Males and females increased home range size with increasing body mass, but the allometric scaling of intensity of space use was negative for males and positive for females, indicating different strategies in search for resources. With decreasing proportion of forest cover inside their home ranges, and, consequently, decreasing thermal quality of their habitat, giant anteaters increased home range size, possibly to maximize the chances of accessing thermal shelters. As frequency and intensity of extreme weather events and deforestation are increasing, effective management efforts need to consider the role of forests as an important thermal resource driving spatial requirements of this species. We highlight that both intrinsic and environmental drivers of animal movement should be integrated to better guide management strategies.

Citing Articles

Bridging the gap between movement data and connectivity analysis using the Time-Explicit Habitat Selection (TEHS) model.

Valle D, Attias N, Cullen J, Hooten M, Giroux A, Oliveira-Santos L Mov Ecol. 2024; 12(1):19.

PMID: 38429836 PMC: 10908110. DOI: 10.1186/s40462-024-00461-1.

References
1.
Morales J, Moorcroft P, Matthiopoulos J, Frair J, Kie J, Powell R . Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010; 365(1550):2289-301. PMC: 2894961. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0082. View

2.
Wilson R, Griffiths I, Mills M, Carbone C, Wilson J, Scantlebury D . Mass enhances speed but diminishes turn capacity in terrestrial pursuit predators. Elife. 2015; 4. PMC: 4542338. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.06487. View

3.
Bertassoni A, Mourao G, Bianchi R . Space use by giant anteaters () in a protected area within human-modified landscape. Ecol Evol. 2020; 10(15):7981-7994. PMC: 7417248. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5911. View

4.
Wells K, Pfeiffer M, Lakim M, Kalko E . Movement trajectories and habitat partitioning of small mammals in logged and unlogged rain forests on Borneo. J Anim Ecol. 2006; 75(5):1212-23. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01144.x. View

5.
Papastamatiou Y, Cartamil D, Lowe C, Meyer C, Wetherbee B, Holland K . Scales of orientation, directed walks and movement path structure in sharks. J Anim Ecol. 2011; 80(4):864-74. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2011.01815.x. View