» Articles » PMID: 34402130

Endometrial Cancer: Who Lives, Who Dies, Can We Improve Their Story?

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2021 Aug 17
PMID 34402130
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecologic cancer in the U.S. The objective of this cohort study was to characterize the clinical and pathologic features that are associated with endometrial cancer-specific death for women cared for at a single National Cancer Institute-designated comprehensive cancer center.

Patients, Materials, And Methods: This is a retrospective cohort from 2014 to 2017 including all women who had a hysterectomy for EC. Charts were reviewed for clinical and pathologic data, focusing on survival outcomes.

Results: Seven hundred seventy-one patients with EC underwent hysterectomy with 760 informative for outcomes. Seventy-six (10%) deaths were related to their EC; 62 women died from recurrent EC. Nonendometrioid histology and advanced stage were predictors of recurrence and EC death. Among patients with endometrioid ECs, mismatch repair status was significantly associated with EC-specific survival (relative risk = 4.8; 95% confidence interval, 2.3-10.3; p < .0001). Most patients with EC who recurred died of their disease 62/83 (74.7%). Nearly half of the patients that recurred (27/62) had no additional therapy at the time of recurrence. Overall survival was significantly longer for those women who had additional treatment at the time of recurrence; however, the improvement in overall survival with therapy at recurrence was largely attributable to effects in those women who were adjuvant therapy naïve.

Conclusion: Although there is benefit of treatment at the time of recurrence for treatment-naïve women; only approximately half of patients were able to receive therapy. There is an urgent need for continued efforts for more effective EC therapy in both the front-line and recurrent setting as well as early identification of cancer diagnosis and recurrence.

Implications For Practice: Approximately 10% of patients died of their endometrial cancer. Most deaths were from recurrent disease; however, almost 20% of endometrial cancer deaths were within 120 days of surgery. Although treatment at the time of recurrence improves overall survival, only approximately half of patients will receive therapy at the time of recurrence. Traditional prognostic features like histology and stage remain important to predict risk of recurrence, and newer biomarkers, such as mismatch repair status, may improve risk stratification and targeted therapy. There remains an urgent need for improved therapy and early detection of diagnosis and recurrence.

Citing Articles

ZOOMit diffusion kurtosis imaging combined with diffusion weighted imaging for the assessment of microsatellite instability in endometrial cancer.

Wang F, Wang Y, Ran C, Liang J, Qi L, Zhang C Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; .

PMID: 39641783 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04720-y.


Short-Term Outcome of Robotic versus Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer in Women with Diabetes: Analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample.

Shen H, Tseng C J Clin Med. 2023; 12(24).

PMID: 38137781 PMC: 10743688. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12247713.


Characterization of mismatch-repair/microsatellite instability-discordant endometrial cancers.

Riedinger C, Esnakula A, Haight P, Suarez A, Chen W, Gillespie J Cancer. 2023; 130(3):385-399.

PMID: 37751191 PMC: 10843110. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35030.


Real-world treatment of German patients with recurrent and advanced endometrial cancer with a post-platinum treatment: a retrospective claims data analysis.

Mevius A, Karl F, Wacker M, Welte R, Krenzer S, Link T J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2022; 149(5):1929-1939.

PMID: 35840862 PMC: 10097742. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04183-y.

References
1.
Carr C, Son J, Yao M, Priyadarshini A, Marquard J, Vargas R . Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of endometrial Cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency in the era of universal Lynch syndrome screening. Gynecol Oncol. 2020; 159(3):712-720. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.039. View

2.
Makker V, Taylor M, Aghajanian C, Oaknin A, Mier J, Cohn A . Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Endometrial Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020; 38(26):2981-2992. PMC: 7479759. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.19.02627. View

3.
Felix A, Weissfeld J, Stone R, Bowser R, Chivukula M, Edwards R . Factors associated with Type I and Type II endometrial cancer. Cancer Causes Control. 2010; 21(11):1851-6. PMC: 2962676. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-010-9612-8. View

4.
Fader A, Roque D, Siegel E, Buza N, Hui P, Abdelghany O . Randomized Phase II Trial of Carboplatin-Paclitaxel Versus Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Trastuzumab in Uterine Serous Carcinomas That Overexpress Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2/neu. J Clin Oncol. 2018; 36(20):2044-2051. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.76.5966. View

5.
Cosgrove C, Cohn D, Hampel H, Frankel W, Jones D, McElroy J . Epigenetic silencing of MLH1 in endometrial cancers is associated with larger tumor volume, increased rate of lymph node positivity and reduced recurrence-free survival. Gynecol Oncol. 2017; 146(3):588-595. PMC: 5601318. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.07.003. View