» Articles » PMID: 34400253

Customized-3D Zirconia Barriers for Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR): Clinical and Histological Findings from a Proof-of-concept Case Series

Overview
Journal J Dent
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2021 Aug 17
PMID 34400253
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this case series was to evaluate, clinically and histologically, customized-3D zirconia barriers manufactured for guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedures.

Methods: Seven healthy consecutive patients with severe bone atrophy (two of them with a bilateral atrophy) were selected for a GBR procedure with a zirconia barrier. In a 3D software (DentalCad, Exocad GmbH, Germany), a virtual bone graft was designed and a shell was designed covering the graft; a standard tessellation language (.STL) file was obtained and milled (M1, Zirkonzahn, Italy) using a 1200 MPa zirconia (Prettau, Zirkonzahn, Italy). Nine GBR surgeries (8 upper-posterior jaw, 1 lower-posterior jaw) were performed using autogenous bone chips mixed with xenograft (SmartBone, IBI-SA, Switzerland / BioOss, Geistlich, Switzerland) covered with a zirconia barrier, fixed by means of screws. After healing, implant sites were prepared with a trephine bur, collecting a bone biopsy, and dental implants were inserted (Neodent, Straumann Group, Switzerland). Specimens were histologically analyzed.

Results: Eight successful surgeries were recorded; one zirconia barrier got exposed after one month of healing but no signs of infection were present till the barrier was removed. In all cases it was possible to insert implants with no additional bone augmentation procedures. Histological evaluations showed the presence of intense deposition of new bone.

Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present case series, the tested customized-3D zirconia barriers confirmed good clinical and histological performances, and, even in case of premature exposure, did not show signs of infection. Preliminary results suggest they are effective for GBR procedures. Further research is necessary with a larger sample size.

Clinical Significance: The presented barriers could be a viable alternative to titanium-reinforced polytetrafluoroethylene membranes and customized meshes.

Citing Articles

Customized 3D-Printed Mesh, Membrane, Bone Substitute, and Dental Implant Applied to Guided Bone Regeneration in Oral Implantology: A Narrative Review.

Di Spirito F, Giordano F, Di Palo M, Ferraro C, Cecere L, Frucci E Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39452431 PMC: 11506345. DOI: 10.3390/dj12100303.


The role of collagen and crystallinity in the physicochemical properties of naturally derived bone grafts.

Ovrebo O, Orlando L, Rubenis K, Ciriello L, Ma Q, Giorgi Z Regen Biomater. 2024; 11:rbae093.

PMID: 39224130 PMC: 11368411. DOI: 10.1093/rb/rbae093.


In vivo comparison of customized zirconia barriers in guided bone regeneration: An experimental study.

Tuncludemir Z, Cinar I, Avci Kupeli Z, Unlu E, Yalcin S Heliyon. 2024; 10(11):e32070.

PMID: 38933977 PMC: 11200291. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32070.


Modularized bioceramic scaffold/hydrogel membrane hierarchical architecture beneficial for periodontal tissue regeneration in dogs.

Wei Y, Wang Z, Han J, Jiang X, Lei L, Yang X Biomater Res. 2022; 26(1):68.

PMID: 36461132 PMC: 9717521. DOI: 10.1186/s40824-022-00315-0.


Bone vitality and vascularization of mandibular and maxillary bone grafts in maxillary sinus floor elevation: A retrospective cohort study.

Wu V, Schulten E, Helder M, Ten Bruggenkate C, Bravenboer N, Klein-Nulend J Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2022; 25(1):141-151.

PMID: 36214357 PMC: 10092303. DOI: 10.1111/cid.13142.