Comparing Two Different Family-based Childhood Obesity Treatment Programmes in a Medically Underserved Region: Effectiveness, Engagement and Implementation Outcomes from a Randomized Controlled Trial
Overview
Pediatrics
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Access to evidence- and family-based childhood obesity (FBCO) treatment interventions is a challenge, especially in underserved regions where childhood obesity disparities persist.
Objective: Compare two 6-month FBCO treatment interventions, iChoose (high intensity, parent-child dyads) and Family Connections (low intensity, parents only), in one underserved US region.
Methods: This unblinded, RCT reports on effectiveness and implementation outcomes. Eligibility included children ages 5-12 with BMI ≥85th percentile. Analyses included descriptive statistics and intention-to-treat Heckman treatment effect models.
Results: Enrolled children (n = 139, mean age 10.1 ± 1.7 years, 30% with overweight, 70% with obesity, 45% black, 63% Medicaid) were randomly assigned to iChoose (n = 70) or Family Connections (n = 69). Retention rates were 63% for iChoose and 84% for Family Connection. Among children, 6-month BMI z-score changes were not statistically significant within iChoose [BMI z-score 0.03 (95% CI = -0.13, 0.19)] or Family Connections [BMI z-score 0.00 (95% CI = -0.16, 0.16)]. Likewise, parents' BMI changes were not statistically significant. No adverse events were reported. Both programmes were delivered with high fidelity (77%-100%). Engagement in core components was 25%-36% for iChoose and 52%-61% for Family Connections. Implementation costs per child with improved BMI z-score were $2841 for iChoose and $955 for Family Connections.
Conclusions: Neither intervention yielded significant improvements in child BMI z-score or parent BMI, yet both were delivered with high fidelity. Relative to iChoose, descriptive data indicated higher retention, better engagement, and lower costs for Family Connections-suggesting that a lower intensity and parent-focused programme may better fit the intended audience's context.
Holmen H, Flolo T, Torris C, Torbjornsen A, Almendingen K, Riiser K Front Pediatr. 2025; 12:1507379.
PMID: 39911768 PMC: 11794496. DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1507379.
Family systems approaches in pediatric obesity management: a scoping review.
Wills-Ibarra N, Chemtob K, Hart H, Frati F, Pratt K, Ball G BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):235.
PMID: 38566046 PMC: 10985863. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04646-w.
Madsen M, Michaelsen L, DeCosta P, Grabowski D Children (Basel). 2024; 11(1).
PMID: 38255360 PMC: 10813986. DOI: 10.3390/children11010046.
Yudkin J, Allicock M, Atem F, Galeener C, Messiah S, Barlow S Child Obes. 2023; 20(2):75-86.
PMID: 36893214 PMC: 11071101. DOI: 10.1089/chi.2022.0185.
Horning M, Friend S, Freese R, Barr-Anderson D, Linde J, Sidebottom A J Acad Nutr Diet. 2022; 123(5):751-760.e1.
PMID: 36244610 PMC: 10097834. DOI: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.10.009.