» Articles » PMID: 34394984

Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion in Atrial Fibrillation Radiofrequency Ablation During Mitral Valve Surgery: A Single-Center Experience

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 2021 Aug 16
PMID 34394984
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Atrial fibrillation surgical radiofrequency ablation (AFSA) during mitral valve surgery (MVS) has almost completely superseded the Cox-Maze procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 100 patients who underwent MVS + AFSA in our institution from January 2008 to June 2017. We compared the effectiveness of AFSA in patients who underwent LAA exclusion to those who did not. Moreover, we analyzed the role of preoperative AF duration (≤ or >1 year) and medial-lateral left atrial dimensions (ML-LAD) (≤ or >6 cm). The efficacy endpoint was freedom from AF at discharge and at 2-year follow-up. The safety endpoints were need of a permanent pacemaker (PMK), surgical re-exploration, occurrence of stroke, and left circumflex artery or esophageal lesions.

Results: Overall, the rate of AF freedom was 69% at discharge and 80% at 2-year follow-up. LAA exclusion did not influence AF freedom at 2-year follow-up, and 84.6% of patients who underwent LAA exclusion were in the sinus rythm (SR) at 2 year compared to 75% of those who did not receive LAA exclusion free from AF as well (=0.230). AF duration ≤1 or >1 year did not influence sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance (85.7% vs. 75.8%; =0.224), and in these two groups, LAA exclusion did not change the efficacy of AFSA. ML-LAD ≤ 6 cm was associated with better results in terms of SR maintenance. A statistically significant association between LAA exclusion and SR maintenance at 2-year follow-up (=0.017) was found among patients with ML-LAD ≤ 6 cm. Complications included 7 cases of PMK implantation, 2 cases of surgical re-exploration, and 1 case of stroke. No circumflex artery or esophageal lesions occurred after surgical procedures.

Conclusions: In our experience, AFSA during isolated MVS resulted in good outcomes in terms of SR maintenance and incidence of complications. AF duration ≤ 1 year did not influence results, while patients with ML-LAD ≤ 6 cm had significantly better results regarding SR at follow-up. In patients with ML-LAD ≤ 6 cm, LAA exclusion significantly increased the success rate of SR maintenance at 2-year follow-up.

Citing Articles

Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral valve surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Eranki A, Muston B, Wilson-Smith A, Wilson-Smith C, Williams M, Doyle M Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2024; 13(1):1-17.

PMID: 38380134 PMC: 10875207. DOI: 10.21037/acs-2023-afm-0131.

References
1.
Abreu Filho C, Lisboa L, Dallan L, Sobreira Spina G, Grinberg M, Scanavacca M . Effectiveness of the maze procedure using cooled-tip radiofrequency ablation in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation and rheumatic mitral valve disease. Circulation. 2005; 112(9 Suppl):I20-5. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.104.526301. View

2.
Chiappini B, Martin-Suarez S, Loforte A, Arpesella G, Di Bartolomeo R, Marinelli G . Cox/Maze III operation versus radiofrequency ablation for the surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation: a comparative study. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004; 77(1):87-92. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01463-2. View

3.
Ad N, Holmes S, Shuman D, Pritchard G . Impact of Atrial Fibrillation Duration on the Success of First-Time Concomitant Cox Maze Procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015; 100(5):1613-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.04.105. View

4.
Hocini M, Shah A, Nault I, Sanders P, Wright M, Narayan S . Localized reentry within the left atrial appendage: arrhythmogenic role in patients undergoing ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2011; 8(12):1853-61. PMC: 3393101. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.07.013. View

5.
Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah D, Garrigue S, Takahashi A, Lavergne T . Electrophysiological end point for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation initiated from multiple pulmonary venous foci. Circulation. 2000; 101(12):1409-17. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.101.12.1409. View