» Articles » PMID: 34394097

Whole Blood Interferon γ Release Is a More Sensitive Marker of Prior Exposure to Than Are Antibody Responses

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2021 Aug 16
PMID 34394097
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

For the zoonotic disease Q fever, serological analysis plays a dominant role in the diagnosis of infection and in pre-screening for past exposure prior to vaccination. A number of studies suggest that assessment of -specific T-cell IFNγ responses may be a more sensitive tool to assess past exposure. In this study, we assessed the performance of a whole blood IFNγ release assay in comparison to serological detection in an area of high Q fever incidence in 2014, up to seven years after initial exposure during the Dutch Q fever outbreak 2007-2010. In a cohort of >1500 individuals from the Dutch outbreak village of Herpen, approximately 60% had mounted IFNγ responses to . This proportion was independent of the strain used for stimulation and much higher than the proportion of individuals scored sero-positive using the serological gold standard immunofluorescence assay. Moreover, -specific IFNγ responses were found to be more durable than antibody responses in two sub-groups of individuals known to have sero-converted as of 2007 or previously reported to the municipality as notified Q fever cases. A novel ready-to-use version of the IFNγ release assay assessed in a subgroup of pre-exposed individuals in 2021 (10-14 years post exposure) proved again to be more sensitive than serology in detecting past exposure. These data demonstrate that -induced IFNγ release is indeed a more sensitive and durable marker of exposure to than are serological responses. In combination with a simplified assay version suitable for implementation in routine diagnostic settings, this makes the assessment of IFNγ responses a valuable tool for exposure screening to obtain epidemiological data, and to identify previously exposed individuals in pre-vaccination screens.

Citing Articles

Cytometry profiling of recall responses to in previously naturally exposed individuals reveals long-term changes in both adaptive and innate immune cellular compartments.

Raju Paul S, Scholzen A, Reeves P, Shepard R, Hess J, Dzeng R Front Immunol. 2023; 14:1249581.

PMID: 37885896 PMC: 10598782. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1249581.


Natural Exposure- and Vaccination-Induced Profiles of Whole Blood Cytokine Responses to .

Raju Paul S, Scholzen A, Mukhtar G, Wilkinson S, Hobson P, Dzeng R Front Immunol. 2022; 13:886698.

PMID: 35812430 PMC: 9259895. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.886698.


Recent Advances on the Innate Immune Response to .

Sireci G, Badami G, Di Liberto D, Blanda V, Grippi F, Di Paola L Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021; 11:754455.

PMID: 34796128 PMC: 8593175. DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.754455.

References
1.
Schoffelen T, Wong A, Rumke H, Netea M, Timen A, van Deuren M . Adverse events and association with age, sex and immunological parameters of Q fever vaccination in patients at risk for chronic Q fever in the Netherlands 2011. Vaccine. 2014; 32(49):6622-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.061. View

2.
Stebegg M, Kumar S, Silva-Cayetano A, Fonseca V, Linterman M, Graca L . Regulation of the Germinal Center Response. Front Immunol. 2018; 9:2469. PMC: 6209676. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02469. View

3.
Graves S . A new assay: specific interferon-γ detection for the diagnosis of previous Q fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 56(12):1752-3. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit132. View

4.
Greig J, Patel M, Clements M, Taylor N . Control strategies for Q fever based on results of pre-vaccination screening in Victoria, 1988 to 2001. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005; 29(1):53-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-842x.2005.tb00749.x. View

5.
Schoffelen T, Joosten L, Herremans T, de Haan A, Ammerdorffer A, Rumke H . Specific interferon γ detection for the diagnosis of previous Q fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2013; 56(12):1742-51. DOI: 10.1093/cid/cit129. View