» Articles » PMID: 34391193

Responses to Diotic Tone-in-noise Stimuli in the Inferior Colliculus: Stimulus Envelope and Neural Fluctuation Cues

Overview
Journal Hear Res
Date 2021 Aug 14
PMID 34391193
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Human detection thresholds in tone-in-noise (TIN) paradigms cannot be explained by the prevalent power-spectrum model when stimulus energy is made less reliable, e.g., in roving-level or equal-energy paradigms. Envelope-related cues provide an alternative that is more robust across level. The TIN stimulus envelope is encoded by slow fluctuations in auditory-nerve (AN) responses - a temporal representation affected by inner-hair-cell (IHC) saturation and cochlear compression. Here, envelope-related fluctuations in AN responses were hypothesized to be reflected in responses of neurons in the inferior colliculus (IC), which have average discharge rates that are sensitive to amplitude-modulation (AM) depth and frequency. Responses to tones masked by narrowband gaussian noise (GN) and low-noise noise (LNN) were recorded in the IC of awake rabbits. Fluctuation amplitudes in the stimulus envelope and in model AN responses decrease for GN maskers and increase for LNN upon addition of tones near threshold. Response rates of IC neurons that are excited by AM were expected to be positively correlated with fluctuation amplitudes, whereas rates of neurons suppressed by AM were expected to be negatively correlated. Of neurons with measurable TIN-detection thresholds, most had the predicted changes in rate with increasing tone level for both GN and LNN maskers. Changes in rate with tone level were correlated with envelope sensitivity measured with two methods, including the maximum slopes of modulation transfer functions. IC rate-based thresholds were broadly consistent with published human and rabbit behavioral data. These results highlight the importance of midbrain sensitivity to envelope cues, as represented in peripheral neural fluctuations, for detection of signals in noise.

Citing Articles

Neural Fluctuation Contrast as a Code for Complex Sounds: The Role and Control of Peripheral Nonlinearities.

Carney L Hear Res. 2024; 443:108966.

PMID: 38310710 PMC: 10923127. DOI: 10.1016/j.heares.2024.108966.


Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward masking: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Brennan M, Svec A, Farhadi A, Maxwell B, Carney L J Acoust Soc Am. 2023; 153(4):1994.

PMID: 37092921 PMC: 10071988. DOI: 10.1121/10.0017724.


Responses to dichotic tone-in-noise stimuli in the inferior colliculus.

Fan L, Henry K, Carney L Front Neurosci. 2022; 16:997656.

PMID: 36532285 PMC: 9751415. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.997656.

References
1.
Kidd Jr G, Mason C, Brantley M, Owen G . Roving-level tone-in-noise detection. J Acoust Soc Am. 1989; 86(4):1310-7. DOI: 10.1121/1.398745. View

2.
Quian Quiroga R, Nadasdy Z, Ben-Shaul Y . Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering. Neural Comput. 2004; 16(8):1661-87. DOI: 10.1162/089976604774201631. View

3.
Richards V . The detectability of a tone added to narrow bands of equal-energy noise. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992; 91(6):3424-35. DOI: 10.1121/1.402831. View

4.
Davidson S, Gilkey R, Colburn H, Carney L . An evaluation of models for diotic and dichotic detection in reproducible noises. J Acoust Soc Am. 2009; 126(4):1906-25. PMC: 2771055. DOI: 10.1121/1.3206583. View

5.
Oxenham A, Shera C . Estimates of human cochlear tuning at low levels using forward and simultaneous masking. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004; 4(4):541-54. PMC: 3202745. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-002-3058-y. View