» Articles » PMID: 34389675

Drivers and Suppressors of Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Aug 14
PMID 34389675
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To identify regulators of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), gene expression profiles of malignant parts of TNBC (mTNBC) and normal adjacent (nadj) parts of the same breasts have been compared. We are interested in the roles of estrogen receptor β (ERβ) and the cytochrome P450 family (CYPs) as drivers of TNBC. We examined by RNA sequencing the mTNBC and nadj parts of five women. We found more than a fivefold elevation in mTNBC of genes already known to be expressed in TNBC: BIRC5/survivin, Wnt-10A and -7B, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), chemokines, anterior gradient proteins, and lysophosphatidic acid receptor and the known basal characteristics of TNBC, sox10, ROPN1B, and Col9a3. There were two unexpected findings: 1) a strong induction of CYPs involved in activation of fatty acids (CYP4), and in inactivation of calcitriol (CYP24A1) and retinoic acid (CYP26A1); and 2) a marked down-regulation of FOS, FRA1, and JUN, known tethering partners of ERβ. ERβ is expressed in 20 to 30% of TNBCs and is being evaluated as a target for treating TNBC. We used ERβ TNBC patient-derived xenografts in mice and found that the ERβ agonist LY500703 had no effect on growth or proliferation. Expression of CYPs was confirmed by immunohistochemistry in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) TNBC. In TNBC cell lines, the CYP4Z1-catalyzed fatty acid metabolite 20-hydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid (20-HETE) increased proliferation, while calcitriol decreased proliferation but only after inhibition of CYP24A1. We conclude that CYP-mediated pathways can be drivers of TNBC but that ERβ is unlikely to be a tumor suppressor because the absence of its main tethering partners renders ERβ functionless on genes involved in proliferation and inflammation.

Citing Articles

Patterns of immune evasion in triple-negative breast cancer and new potential therapeutic targets: a review.

Serrano Garcia L, Javega B, Llombart Cussac A, Gion M, Perez-Garcia J, Cortes J Front Immunol. 2024; 15:1513421.

PMID: 39735530 PMC: 11671371. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1513421.


Comprehensive single-cell aging atlas of healthy mammary tissues reveals shared epigenomic and transcriptomic signatures of aging and cancer.

Angarola B, Sharma S, Katiyar N, Kang H, Nehar-Belaid D, Park S Nat Aging. 2024; 5(1):122-143.

PMID: 39587369 PMC: 11754115. DOI: 10.1038/s43587-024-00751-8.


Brca1 haploinsufficiency promotes early tumor onset and epigenetic alterations in a mouse model of hereditary breast cancer.

Li C, Cordes A, Oliphant M, Quinn S, Thomas M, Selfors L Nat Genet. 2024; 56(12):2763-2775.

PMID: 39528827 DOI: 10.1038/s41588-024-01958-6.


Network medicine based approach for identifying the type 2 diabetes, osteoarthritis and triple negative breast cancer interactome: Finding the hub of hub genes.

Durrani I, John P, Bhatti A, Khan J Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e36650.

PMID: 39281650 PMC: 11401126. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36650.


Network-based approach elucidates critical genes in BRCA subtypes and chemotherapy response in triple negative breast cancer.

Agrawal P, Jain N, Gopalan V, Timon A, Singh A, Rajagopal P iScience. 2024; 27(5):109752.

PMID: 38699227 PMC: 11063905. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109752.


References
1.
Krishnan A, Swami S, Feldman D . The potential therapeutic benefits of vitamin D in the treatment of estrogen receptor positive breast cancer. Steroids. 2012; 77(11):1107-12. PMC: 3429709. DOI: 10.1016/j.steroids.2012.06.005. View

2.
Zhou T, Yu L, Huang J, Zhao X, Li Y, Hu Y . GDF10 inhibits proliferation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in triple-negative breast cancer via upregulation of Smad7. Aging (Albany NY). 2019; 11(10):3298-3314. PMC: 6555447. DOI: 10.18632/aging.101983. View

3.
Yang M, Zeng C, Li P, Qian L, Ding B, Huang L . Impact of CXCR4 and CXCR7 knockout by CRISPR/Cas9 on the function of triple-negative breast cancer cells. Onco Targets Ther. 2019; 12:3849-3858. PMC: 6527053. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S195661. View

4.
Shay G, Lynch C, Fingleton B . Moving targets: Emerging roles for MMPs in cancer progression and metastasis. Matrix Biol. 2015; 44-46:200-6. PMC: 4564058. DOI: 10.1016/j.matbio.2015.01.019. View

5.
Zalewski A, Cecchini E, Deroo B . Expression of extracellular matrix components is disrupted in the immature and adult estrogen receptor β-null mouse ovary. PLoS One. 2012; 7(1):e29937. PMC: 3254630. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029937. View