» Articles » PMID: 34388511

Longitudinal Analysis of the UK COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study: Trajectories of Anxiety, Depression and COVID-19-related Stress Symptomology

Overview
Journal Psychiatry Res
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2021 Aug 13
PMID 34388511
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

COVID-19 has had a negative impact on the mental health of individuals. The aim of the COVID-19 Psychological Wellbeing Study was to identify trajectories of anxiety, depression and COVID-19-related traumatic stress (CV19TS) symptomology during the first UK national lockdown. We also sought to explore risk and protective factors. The study was a longitudinal, three-wave survey of UK adults conducted online. Analysis used growth mixture modelling and logistic regressions. Data was collected from 1958 adults. A robust 4-class model for anxiety, depression, and CV19TS symptomology distinguished participants in relation to the severity and stability of symptomology. Classes described low and stable and high and stable symptomology, and symptomology that improved or declined across the study period. Several risk and protection factors were identified as predicting membership of classes (e.g., mental health factors, sociodemographic factors and COVID-19 worries). This study reports trajectories describing a differential impact of COVID-19 on the mental health of UK adults. Some adults experienced psychological distress throughout, some were more vulnerable in the early weeks, and for others vulnerability was delayed. These findings emphasise the need for appropriate mental health support interventions to promote improved outcomes in the COVID-19 recovery phase and future pandemics.

Citing Articles

Depressive symptomatology in Brazil: perspectives of statistical and psychometrics analyses of the PHQ-9 at four time-points (2020-2023) in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Faro A, Nunes D, Falk D Front Psychol. 2025; 16:1440054.

PMID: 39973955 PMC: 11835823. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1440054.


Comparing positive versus negative intrinsic rewards for predicting physical activity habit strength and frequency during a period of high stress.

Fremling L, Phillips L, Bottoms L, Desai T, Newby K Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2025; 17(1):e12650.

PMID: 39904304 PMC: 11793929. DOI: 10.1111/aphw.12650.


Rural-urban and age differences in association between depression and suicidal attempt: a large retrospective clinical sample study in China.

Ge D, Xia Y, Zhang Z BMJ Open. 2025; 15(1):e088944.

PMID: 39890147 PMC: 11795412. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088944.


Effects of Pandemic Response Measures on Crime Counts in English and Welsh Local Authorities.

Pourshir Sefidi N, Shoari Nejad A, Mooney P Appl Spat Anal Policy. 2024; 18(1):15.

PMID: 39574460 PMC: 11576790. DOI: 10.1007/s12061-024-09614-6.


The influence of hope and optimism on trajectories of COVID-19 stress, health anxiety, and wellbeing during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Long L, Viana A, Zvolensky M, Lu Q, Gallagher M J Clin Psychol. 2024; 80(12):2387-2404.

PMID: 39380319 PMC: 11733826. DOI: 10.1002/jclp.23746.


References
1.
Spitzer R, Kroenke K, Williams J, Lowe B . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166(10):1092-7. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092. View

2.
Ahorsu D, Lin C, Imani V, Saffari M, Griffiths M, Pakpour A . The Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Development and Initial Validation. Int J Ment Health Addict. 2020; 20(3):1537-1545. PMC: 7100496. DOI: 10.1007/s11469-020-00270-8. View

3.
OConnor D, Aggleton J, Chakrabarti B, Cooper C, Creswell C, Dunsmuir S . Research priorities for the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A call to action for psychological science. Br J Psychol. 2020; 111(4):603-629. PMC: 7404603. DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12468. View

4.
Wang C, Chudzicka-Czupala A, Tee M, Nunez M, Tripp C, Fardin M . A chain mediation model on COVID-19 symptoms and mental health outcomes in Americans, Asians and Europeans. Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):6481. PMC: 7979938. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85943-7. View

5.
Muthen B . Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychol Methods. 2003; 8(3):369-77. DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.8.3.369. View