» Articles » PMID: 34386566

Evaluation of Antibody Immunochromatography Testing for Diagnosis of Current Infection

Overview
Journal Pract Lab Med
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2021 Aug 13
PMID 34386566
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: infection represents a major gastrointestinal complaint associated with gastritis, gastric ulcer and stomach tumors. It is present in 90 % of developing countries population. diagnosis in these countries, where resources are limited, is accomplished with simple non-invasive tests such as stool antigen and serum antibody tests. The aim of this study was to evaluate the serum antibody test in the diagnosis of current infection.

Subject And Methods: A total of 117 patients were included in this prospective diagnosis accuracy testing study, who clinically presented with dyspepsia, heartburn, abdominal pain, diarrhea, or halitosis. A stool sample was collected from each patient and tested for antigen using immunochromatographic method.Blood sample was also collected, half of which was EDTA-sampled and analyzed for complete blood count, while the remaining half was left to clot, the separated serum was tested for antibodies against with immunochromatographic cassette.

Results: About 35 % of sixty six patients who were positive for stool antigen test gave a negative for serum antibodies test. Meanwhile, the non-consistent results within 51 negative stool antigen test patients was exhibited by 47 % of them. The discrepancies were not affected by age or disease duration. The calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive values were 50 %, 65 %, 65 % and 50 % respectively.

Conclusion: The serum antibody test is not reliable in the diagnosis of current infection. In developing countries, with limited facilities and primary care units, stool antigen test diagnosis is useful for diagnosis.

Citing Articles

Development and optimization of a new competitive ELISA using recombinant (rPSA D15 and rCag11) antigens for the detection of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Eskeziyaw B, Maina N, Waihenya R, Munyao M, Nyandwaro T, Inoue S PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0317227.

PMID: 39813278 PMC: 11734991. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0317227.


Comparison of chemiluminiscence versus lateral flow assay for the detection of Helicobacter pylori antigen in human fecal samples.

Rescalvo-Casas C, Hernando-Gozalo M, Pereda L, Bertolin C, Perez-Garcia F, Cuadros-Gonzalez J Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2023; 42(8):959-962.

PMID: 37243827 PMC: 10345075. DOI: 10.1007/s10096-023-04624-7.

References
1.
Kato S, Ozawa K, Okuda M, Nakayama Y, Yoshimura N, Konno M . Multicenter comparison of rapid lateral flow stool antigen immunoassay and stool antigen enzyme immunoassay for the diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection in children. Helicobacter. 2004; 9(6):669-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1083-4389.2004.00279.x. View

2.
Kato S, Ozawa K, Okuda M, Fujisawa T, Kagimoto S, Konno M . Accuracy of the stool antigen test for the diagnosis of childhood Helicobacter pylori infection: a multicenter Japanese study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003; 98(2):296-300. DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07263.x. View

3.
Shimoyama T . Stool antigen tests for the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2013; 19(45):8188-91. PMC: 3857440. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8188. View

4.
Mattsson A, Quiding-Jarbrink M, Lonroth H, Hamlet A, Ahlstedt I, Svennerholm A . Antibody-secreting cells in the stomachs of symptomatic and asymptomatic Helicobacter pylori-infected subjects. Infect Immun. 1998; 66(6):2705-12. PMC: 108259. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.66.6.2705-2712.1998. View

5.
PETERSON W . Helicobacter pylori and peptic ulcer disease. N Engl J Med. 1991; 324(15):1043-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199104113241507. View