» Articles » PMID: 34385324

Genome Accessibility Dynamics in Response to Phosphate Limitation is Controlled by the PHR1 Family of Transcription Factors in

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Aug 13
PMID 34385324
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

As phosphorus is one of the most limiting nutrients in many natural and agricultural ecosystems, plants have evolved strategies that cope with its scarcity. Genetic approaches have facilitated the identification of several molecular elements that regulate the phosphate (Pi) starvation response (PSR) of plants, including the master regulator of the transcriptional response to phosphate starvation PHOSPHATE STARVATION RESPONSE1 (PHR1). However, the chromatin modifications underlying the plant transcriptional response to phosphate scarcity remain largely unknown. Here, we present a detailed analysis of changes in chromatin accessibility during phosphate starvation in root cells. Root cells undergo a genome-wide remodeling of chromatin accessibility in response to Pi starvation that is often associated with changes in the transcription of neighboring genes. Analysis of chromatin accessibility in the double mutant revealed that the transcription factors PHR1 and PHL2 play a key role in remodeling chromatin accessibility in response to Pi limitation. We also discovered that PHR1 and PHL2 play an important role in determining chromatin accessibility and the associated transcription of many genes under optimal Pi conditions, including genes involved in the PSR. We propose that a set of transcription factors directly activated by PHR1 in Pi-starved root cells trigger a second wave of epigenetic changes required for the transcriptional activation of the complete set of low-Pi-responsive genes.

Citing Articles

TaTCP6 is required for efficient and balanced utilization of nitrate and phosphorus in wheat.

Liu B, Xu W, Niu Y, Li Q, Cao B, Qi J Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1683.

PMID: 39956820 PMC: 11830803. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57008-0.


Correlation Analysis of Soil Microbial Communities and Physicochemical Properties with Growth Characteristics of Across Different Habitats.

Jeong D, Yun Y, Son H, Um Y, Song J, Kim J Plants (Basel). 2024; 13(23).

PMID: 39683103 PMC: 11644716. DOI: 10.3390/plants13233310.


Live Single-Cell Transcriptional Dynamics in Plant Cells.

Hani S, Mercier C, David P, Bertrand E, Desnos T, Nussaume L Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2875:37-58.

PMID: 39535638 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4248-1_4.


Evolution of phosphate scouting in the terrestrial biosphere.

Abel S, Naumann C Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024; 379(1914):20230355.

PMID: 39343020 PMC: 11528361. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0355.


Cross-kingdom nutrient exchange in the plant-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus-bacterium continuum.

Duan S, Feng G, Limpens E, Bonfante P, Xie X, Zhang L Nat Rev Microbiol. 2024; 22(12):773-790.

PMID: 39014094 DOI: 10.1038/s41579-024-01073-7.


References
1.
Muller R, Morant M, Jarmer H, Nilsson L, Nielsen T . Genome-wide analysis of the Arabidopsis leaf transcriptome reveals interaction of phosphate and sugar metabolism. Plant Physiol. 2006; 143(1):156-71. PMC: 1761981. DOI: 10.1104/pp.106.090167. View

2.
Lun A, Smyth G . De novo detection of differentially bound regions for ChIP-seq data using peaks and windows: controlling error rates correctly. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(11):e95. PMC: 4066778. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gku351. View

3.
Berndt T, Kumar R . Novel mechanisms in the regulation of phosphorus homeostasis. Physiology (Bethesda). 2009; 24:17-25. PMC: 3963411. DOI: 10.1152/physiol.00034.2008. View

4.
Hu S, Yang S, Lu Y, Deng Y, Li L, Zhu J . Dynamics of the Transcriptome and Accessible Chromatin Landscapes During Early Goose Ovarian Development. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020; 8:196. PMC: 7145905. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2020.00196. View

5.
Bubb K, Deal R . Considerations in the analysis of plant chromatin accessibility data. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2020; 54:69-78. PMC: 8959678. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.01.003. View