» Articles » PMID: 34379745

Sunscreens With High Versus Low Sun Protection Factor and Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Risk: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Overview
Journal Am J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 Aug 11
PMID 34379745
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Evidence on sunscreen use and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) risk is limited. Most studies have not taken sun protection factor (SPF) into consideration and used nonusers of sunscreen as the reference group. Nonusers are likely a priori at lower cSCC risk than users. No study has investigated the effect of high- versus low-SPF sunscreens on cSCC, appropriately adjusting for time-varying confounding. Using data from the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study (1991-2016), we investigated whether use of SPF ≥15 versus SPF <15 sunscreens reduces cSCC risk. We used a marginal structural Cox proportional hazards model with inverse probability of treatment and censoring weights to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). During follow-up of 148,781 women (mean follow-up, 14.3 years), 653 women were diagnosed with cSCC. The effect on cSCC risk of sunscreens with SPF ≥15 versus SPF <15 was close to the null when used at any latitudes (HR = 1.02, 95% CI: 0.82, 1.27) and when used in lower-latitude settings (HR = 1.05, 95% CI: 0.84, 1.32). In conclusion, we found no indication that sunscreens with SPF ≥15 reduced Norwegian women's cSCC risk more than sunscreens with SPF <15, suggesting that either there is no difference in their effects long-term or the difference is diluted by incorrect application.

Citing Articles

Sunscreen Use and Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma Risk: A Review of the Evidence.

Lergenmuller S, Rueegg C, Ghiasvand R, Veierod M Acta Derm Venereol. 2025; 105():adv42550.

PMID: 39791514 PMC: 11744707. DOI: 10.2340/actadv.v105.42550.


Gaps in the usage and reporting of multiple imputation for incomplete data: findings from a scoping review of observational studies addressing causal questions.

Mainzer R, Moreno-Betancur M, Nguyen C, Simpson J, Carlin J, Lee K BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):193.

PMID: 39232661 PMC: 11373423. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02302-6.

References
1.
English D, Armstrong B, Kricker A, Winter M, Heenan P, Randell P . Case-control study of sun exposure and squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Int J Cancer. 1998; 77(3):347-53. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19980729)77:3<347::aid-ijc7>3.0.co;2-o. View

2.
Greenland S, Pearl J, Robins J . Causal diagrams for epidemiologic research. Epidemiology. 1999; 10(1):37-48. View

3.
Green A, Williams G . Point: sunscreen use is a safe and effective approach to skin cancer prevention. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2007; 16(10):1921-2. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-07-0477. View

4.
Lund E, Dumeaux V, Braaten T, Hjartaker A, Engeset D, Skeie G . Cohort profile: The Norwegian Women and Cancer Study--NOWAC--Kvinner og kreft. Int J Epidemiol. 2007; 37(1):36-41. DOI: 10.1093/ije/dym137. View

5.
Green A, Williams G, Neale R, Hart V, Leslie D, Parsons P . Daily sunscreen application and betacarotene supplementation in prevention of basal-cell and squamous-cell carcinomas of the skin: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 1999; 354(9180):723-9. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12168-2. View