» Articles » PMID: 34379217

Outcome of Cancer Patients Considered for Intensive Care Unit Admission in Two University Hospitals in the Netherlands: the Danger of Delayed ICU Admissions and Off-hour Triage Decisions

Overview
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2021 Aug 11
PMID 34379217
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Very few studies assessed the association between Intensive Care Unit (ICU) triage decisions and mortality. The aim of this study was to assess whether an association could be found between 30-day mortality, and ICU admission consultation conditions and triage decisions.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in two large referral university hospitals in the Netherlands. We identified all adult cancer patients for whom ICU admission was requested from 2016 to 2019. Via a multivariable logistic regression analysis, we assessed the association between 30-day mortality, and ICU admission consultation conditions and triage decisions.

Results: Of the 780 cancer patients for whom ICU admission was requested, 332 patients (42.6%) were considered 'too well to benefit' from ICU admission, 382 (49%) patients were immediately admitted to the ICU and 66 patients (8.4%) were considered 'too sick to benefit' according to the consulting intensivist(s). The 30-day mortality in these subgroups was 30.1%, 36.9% and 81.8%, respectively. In the patient group considered 'too well to benefit', 258 patients were never admitted to the ICU and 74 patients (9.5% of the overall study population, 22.3% of the patients 'too well to benefit') were admitted to the ICU after a second ICU admission request (delayed ICU admission). Thirty-day mortality in these groups was 25.6% and 45.9%. After adjustment for confounders, ICU consultations during off-hours (OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.09-2.38, p-value 0.02) and delayed ICU admission (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.00-3.33, p-value 0.048 compared to "ICU admission") were independently associated with 30-day mortality.

Conclusion: The ICU denial rate in our study was high (51%). Sixty percent of the ICU triage decisions in cancer patients were made during off-hours, and 22.3% of the patients initially considered "too well to benefit" from ICU admission were subsequently admitted to the ICU. Both decisions during off-hours and a delayed ICU admission were associated with an increased risk of death at 30 days. Our study suggests that in cancer patients, ICU triage decisions should be discussed during on-hours, and ICU admission policy should be broadened, with a lower admission threshold for critically ill cancer patients.

Citing Articles

Outcome of patients with solid malignancies considered for intensive care unit admission: a single-center prospective cohort study.

Benguerfi S, Hirsinger B, Raimbourg J, Agbakou M, Munoz Calahorro R, Vennier A Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(11):726.

PMID: 39397173 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08935-z.


Septic shock in the immunocompromised cancer patient: a narrative review.

Nates J, Pene F, Darmon M, Mokart D, Castro P, David S Crit Care. 2024; 28(1):285.

PMID: 39215292 PMC: 11363658. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-05073-0.


[With a tumor diagnosis in the intensive care unit].

Beutel G, Liebregts T, Boll B Inn Med (Heidelb). 2023; 64(10):946-954.

PMID: 37728738 DOI: 10.1007/s00108-023-01583-1.


Triage of Critically Ill Patients: Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients Refused as Too Well for Intensive Care.

Sridharan G, Fleury Y, Hergafi L, Doll S, Ksouri H J Clin Med. 2023; 12(17).

PMID: 37685579 PMC: 10488145. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12175513.


Etiologies and Outcome of Patients with Solid Tumors Admitted to ICU with Acute Respiratory Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the EFRAIM Study.

Benguerfi S, Dumas G, Soares M, Meert A, Martin-Loeches I, Pene F Respir Care. 2023; 68(6):740-748.

PMID: 37072164 PMC: 10209001. DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10604.


References
1.
Malvezzi M, Carioli G, Bertuccio P, Rosso T, Boffetta P, Levi F . European cancer mortality predictions for the year 2016 with focus on leukaemias. Ann Oncol. 2016; 27(4):725-31. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdw022. View

2.
de Vries V, Muller M, Arbous M, Biemond B, Blijlevens N, Kusadasi N . Long-Term Outcome of Patients With a Hematologic Malignancy and Multiple Organ Failure Admitted at the Intensive Care. Crit Care Med. 2018; 47(2):e120-e128. PMC: 6336487. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003526. View

3.
Lopez R, Samtani S, Montes J, Perez R, Martin M, Salazar A . Survival of Critically Ill Oncologic Patients Requiring Invasive Ventilatory Support: A Prospective Comparative Cohort Study With Nononcologic Patients. J Glob Oncol. 2019; 5:1-8. PMC: 6733201. DOI: 10.1200/JGO.19.00184. View

4.
Auclin E, Charles-Nelson A, Abbar B, Guerot E, Oudard S, Hauw-Berlemont C . Outcomes in elderly patients admitted to the intensive care unit with solid tumors. Ann Intensive Care. 2017; 7(1):26. PMC: 5339259. DOI: 10.1186/s13613-017-0250-0. View

5.
Thiery G, Azoulay E, Darmon M, Ciroldi M, de Miranda S, Levy V . Outcome of cancer patients considered for intensive care unit admission: a hospital-wide prospective study. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(19):4406-13. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.487. View