» Articles » PMID: 34378980

Local Network Properties of Soil and Rhizosphere Microbial Communities in Potato Plantations Treated with a Biological Product Are Important Predictors of Crop Yield

Overview
Journal mSphere
Date 2021 Aug 11
PMID 34378980
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Understanding the effectiveness and potential mechanism of action of agricultural biological products under different soil profiles and crops will allow more precise product recommendations based on local conditions and will ultimately result in increased crop yield. This study aimed to use bulk soil and rhizosphere microbial composition and structure to evaluate the potential effect of a Bacillus amyloliquefaciens inoculant (strain QST713) on potatoes and to explore its relationship with crop yield. We implemented next-generation sequencing (NGS) and bioinformatics approaches to assess the bacterial and fungal biodiversity in 185 soil samples, distributed over four different time points-from planting to harvest-from three different geographical locations in the United States. In addition to location and sampling time (which includes the difference between bulk soil and rhizosphere) as the main variables defining the microbiome composition, the microbial inoculant applied as a treatment also had a small but significant effect in fungal communities and a marginally significant effect in bacterial communities. However, treatment preserved the native communities without causing a detectable long-lasting effect on the alpha- and beta-diversity patterns after harvest. Using information about the application of the microbial inoculant and considering microbiome composition and structure data, we were able to train a Random Forest model to estimate if a bulk soil or rhizosphere sample came from a low- or high-yield block with relatively high accuracy (84.6%), concluding that the structure of fungal communities gives us more information as an estimator of potato yield than the structure of bacterial communities. Our results reinforce the notion that each cultivar on each location recruits a unique microbial community and that these communities are modulated by the vegetative growth stage of the plant. Moreover, inoculation of a Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain QST713-based product on potatoes also changed the abundance of specific taxonomic groups and the structure of local networks in those locations where the product caused an increase in the yield. The data obtained, from in-field assays, allowed training a predictive model to estimate the yield of a certain block, identifying microbiome variables-especially those related to microbial community structure-even with a higher predictive power than the geographical location of the block (that is, the principal determinant of microbial beta-diversity). The methods described here can be replicated to fit new models in any other crop and to evaluate the effect of any agricultural input in the composition and structure of the soil microbiome.

Citing Articles

Short impact on soil microbiome of a QST713 based product that correlates with higher potato yield across USA.

Adamo I, Acin-Albiac M, Rottjers S, de Prado D, Benito B, Zamora J Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1332840.

PMID: 38545390 PMC: 10967024. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1332840.


Physicochemical Properties and Microbiome of Vineyard Soils from DOP Ribeiro (NW Spain) Are Influenced by Agricultural Management.

Blanco P, Rodriguez I, Fernandez-Fernandez V, Ramil M, Castrillo D, Acin-Albiac M Microorganisms. 2024; 12(3).

PMID: 38543648 PMC: 10974217. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12030595.


Investigating the relationship between microbial network features of giant kelp "seedbank" cultures and subsequent farm performance.

Osborne M, Simons A, Molano G, Tolentino B, Singh A, Arismendi G PLoS One. 2024; 19(3):e0295740.

PMID: 38536857 PMC: 10971754. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295740.


Compositionality, sparsity, spurious heterogeneity, and other data-driven challenges for machine learning algorithms within plant microbiome studies.

Busato S, Gordon M, Chaudhari M, Jensen I, Akyol T, Andersen S Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2022; 71:102326.

PMID: 36538837 PMC: 9925409. DOI: 10.1016/j.pbi.2022.102326.

References
1.
Rasche F, Hodl V, Poll C, Kandeler E, Gerzabek M, van Elsas J . Rhizosphere bacteria affected by transgenic potatoes with antibacterial activities compared with the effects of soil, wild-type potatoes, vegetation stage and pathogen exposure. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2006; 56(2):219-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2005.00027.x. View

2.
Arif I, Batool M, Schenk P . Plant Microbiome Engineering: Expected Benefits for Improved Crop Growth and Resilience. Trends Biotechnol. 2020; 38(12):1385-1396. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2020.04.015. View

3.
Malley J, Kruppa J, Dasgupta A, Malley K, Ziegler A . Probability machines: consistent probability estimation using nonparametric learning machines. Methods Inf Med. 2011; 51(1):74-81. PMC: 3250568. DOI: 10.3414/ME00-01-0052. View

4.
Toju H, Peay K, Yamamichi M, Narisawa K, Hiruma K, Naito K . Core microbiomes for sustainable agroecosystems. Nat Plants. 2018; 4(5):247-257. DOI: 10.1038/s41477-018-0139-4. View

5.
Nilsson R, Larsson K, Taylor A, Bengtsson-Palme J, Jeppesen T, Schigel D . The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018; 47(D1):D259-D264. PMC: 6324048. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1022. View