» Articles » PMID: 34375394

Effect of Intravenous Fluid Treatment With a Balanced Solution Vs 0.9% Saline Solution on Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Importance: Intravenous fluids are used for almost all intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Clinical and laboratory studies have questioned whether specific fluid types result in improved outcomes, including mortality and acute kidney injury.

Objective: To determine the effect of a balanced solution vs saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) on 90-day survival in critically ill patients.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Double-blind, factorial, randomized clinical trial conducted at 75 ICUs in Brazil. Patients who were admitted to the ICU with at least 1 risk factor for worse outcomes, who required at least 1 fluid expansion, and who were expected to remain in the ICU for more than 24 hours were randomized between May 29, 2017, and March 2, 2020; follow-up concluded on October 29, 2020. Patients were randomized to 2 different fluid types (a balanced solution vs saline solution reported in this article) and 2 different infusion rates (reported separately).

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either a balanced solution (n = 5522) or 0.9% saline solution (n = 5530) for all intravenous fluids.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The primary outcome was 90-day survival.

Results: Among 11 052 patients who were randomized, 10 520 (95.2%) were available for the analysis (mean age, 61.1 [SD, 17] years; 44.2% were women). There was no significant interaction between the 2 interventions (fluid type and infusion speed; P = .98). Planned surgical admissions represented 48.4% of all patients. Of all the patients, 60.6% had hypotension or vasopressor use and 44.3% required mechanical ventilation at enrollment. Patients in both groups received a median of 1.5 L of fluid during the first day after enrollment. By day 90, 1381 of 5230 patients (26.4%) assigned to a balanced solution died vs 1439 of 5290 patients (27.2%) assigned to saline solution (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.90-1.05]; P = .47). There were no unexpected treatment-related severe adverse events in either group.

Conclusion And Relevance: Among critically ill patients requiring fluid challenges, use of a balanced solution compared with 0.9% saline solution did not significantly reduce 90-day mortality. The findings do not support the use of this balanced solution.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02875873.

Citing Articles

Volume kinetics in a translational porcine model of stabilized sepsis with fluid accumulation.

Hong S, Dumargne H, Hahn R, Hammed A, Lac R, Guilpin A Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):92.

PMID: 40022194 PMC: 11869627. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05308-8.


The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.

Shime N, Nakada T, Yatabe T, Yamakawa K, Aoki Y, Inoue S Acute Med Surg. 2025; 12(1):e70037.

PMID: 39996161 PMC: 11848044. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.70037.


Ten tips on how to reduce iatrogenic acute kidney injury.

Booke H, von Groote T, Zarbock A Clin Kidney J. 2025; 18(2):sfae412.

PMID: 39950155 PMC: 11822294. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae412.


Serum chloride concentration and outcomes in adults receiving intravenous fluid therapy with a balanced crystalloid solution or 0.9% sodium chloride.

Ramanan M, Hammond N, Billot L, Delaney A, Devaux A, Finfer S Intensive Care Med. 2025; 51(2):249-258.

PMID: 39928118 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-024-07764-2.


Balanced crystalloid versus saline for resuscitation in pediatric septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Vijendra B, Bertol A, de Almeida M, de Freitas P, Simao A, de Faria B BMC Pediatr. 2025; 25(1):81.

PMID: 39891147 PMC: 11783956. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-025-05442-w.


References
1.
Self W, Semler M, Wanderer J, Wang L, Byrne D, Collins S . Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Noncritically Ill Adults. N Engl J Med. 2018; 378(9):819-828. PMC: 5846618. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1711586. View

2.
Semler M, Kellum J . Balanced Crystalloid Solutions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2018; 199(8):952-960. PMC: 6467313. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201809-1677CI. View

3.
Finfer S, Myburgh J, Bellomo R . Intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill adults. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2018; 14(9):541-557. DOI: 10.1038/s41581-018-0044-0. View

4.
Zampieri F, Ranzani O, Azevedo L, Martins I, Kellum J, Liborio A . Lactated Ringer Is Associated With Reduced Mortality and Less Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2016; 44(12):2163-2170. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001948. View

5.
Roquilly A, Loutrel O, Cinotti R, Rosenczweig E, Flet L, Mahe P . Balanced versus chloride-rich solutions for fluid resuscitation in brain-injured patients: a randomised double-blind pilot study. Crit Care. 2013; 17(2):R77. PMC: 4057192. DOI: 10.1186/cc12686. View