» Articles » PMID: 34374098

Multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) for Treatment Response Assessment of Radiation Therapy

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2021 Aug 10
PMID 34374098
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the modern radiation therapy (RT) workflow. In comparison with computed tomography (CT) imaging, which is the dominant imaging modality in RT, MRI possesses excellent soft-tissue contrast for radiographic evaluation. Based on quantitative models, MRI can be used to assess tissue functional and physiological information. With the developments of scanner design, acquisition strategy, advanced data analysis, and modeling, multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), a combination of morphologic and functional imaging modalities, has been increasingly adopted for disease detection, localization, and characterization. Integration of mpMRI techniques into RT enriches the opportunities to individualize RT. In particular, RT response assessment using mpMRI allows for accurate characterization of both tissue anatomical and biochemical changes to support decision-making in monotherapy of radiation treatment and/or systematic cancer management. In recent years, accumulating evidence have, indeed, demonstrated the potentials of mpMRI in RT response assessment regarding patient stratification, trial benchmarking, early treatment intervention, and outcome modeling. Clinical application of mpMRI for treatment response assessment in routine radiation oncology workflow, however, is more complex than implementing an additional imaging protocol; mpMRI requires additional focus on optimal study design, practice standardization, and unified statistical reporting strategy to realize its full potential in the context of RT. In this article, the mpMRI theories, including image mechanism, protocol design, and data analysis, will be reviewed with a focus on the radiation oncology field. Representative works will be discussed to demonstrate how mpMRI can be used for RT response assessment. Additionally, issues and limits of current works, as well as challenges and potential future research directions, will also be discussed.

Citing Articles

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging responses in head and neck cancer patients treated with magnetic resonance-guided hypofractionated radiation therapy.

Bonate R, Awan M, Himburg H, Wong S, Shukla M, Tarima S Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025; 33:100693.

PMID: 39877149 PMC: 11772986. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100693.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques for Post-Treatment Evaluation After External Beam Radiation Therapy of Prostate Cancer: Narrative Review.

Bekou E, Mulita A, Seimenis I, Kotini A, Courcoutsakis N, Koukourakis M Clin Pract. 2025; 15(1).

PMID: 39851787 PMC: 11763658. DOI: 10.3390/clinpract15010004.


Potential of quantitative T1 mapping to serve as a novel prognostic predictor of clear cell renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy.

Zhong L, Wang R, Tang Q, Huang S, Dai C, Ding Y Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2024; 14(10):7600-7611.

PMID: 39429588 PMC: 11485360. DOI: 10.21037/qims-23-1829.


Inversion-recovery ultrashort-echo-time (IR-UTE) MRI-based detection of radiation dose heterogeneity in gynecologic cancer patients treated with HDR brachytherapy.

Sheikh K, Daniel B, Roumeliotis M, Lee J, Hrinivich W, Benkert T Radiat Oncol. 2024; 19(1):105.

PMID: 39107776 PMC: 11305063. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02499-2.


Biomarker-driven molecular imaging probes in radiotherapy.

Li H, Gong Q, Luo K Theranostics. 2024; 14(10):4127-4146.

PMID: 38994026 PMC: 11234278. DOI: 10.7150/thno.97768.


References
1.
Boon I, Lim J, Yap M, Au Yong T, Boon C . Artificial intelligence and soft skills in radiation oncology: Data versus wisdom. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020; 51(4S):S114-S115. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmir.2020.08.011. View

2.
Ouwerkerk R, Bleich K, Gillen J, Pomper M, Bottomley P . Tissue sodium concentration in human brain tumors as measured with 23Na MR imaging. Radiology. 2003; 227(2):529-37. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2272020483. View

3.
Cha J, Kim S, Kim H, Kim B, Kim Y, Lee J . Differentiation of tumor progression from pseudoprogression in patients with posttreatment glioblastoma using multiparametric histogram analysis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014; 35(7):1309-17. PMC: 7966603. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3876. View

4.
Carroll T, Teneggi V, Jobin M, Squassante L, Treyer V, Hany T . Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow with magnetic resonance, reproducibility of the method, and comparison with H2(15)O positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2002; 22(9):1149-56. DOI: 10.1097/00004647-200209000-00013. View

5.
Giglio P, Gilbert M . Cerebral radiation necrosis. Neurologist. 2003; 9(4):180-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.nrl.0000080951.78533.c4. View