» Articles » PMID: 34374000

Advanced Backward Planning with Custom-milled Individual Allogeneic Block Augmentation for Maxillary Full-arch Osteoplasty and Dental Implantation:a 3-year Follow-up

Overview
Date 2021 Aug 10
PMID 34374000
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the case of maxillary involution, augmentation is necessary for implant-supported prosthetics. The use of bone grafts is standard; customized allogeneic bone blocks may be a predictable alternative before dental implantation. For maxillary full-arch reconstruction, this case shows a horse-shoe augmentation by four allogeneic blocks, followed by guided dental implantation and fixed prosthetics after 6 months of healing. Using allogeneic blocks is an option for full-arch maxillary augmentation and comparable with autologous bone grafts. There is no donor site comorbidity. Bone height is stable for a minimum of 3 years after loading with resorption less than 10% in vertical, buccolingual, and mesiodistal directions. Short-implants allow for the long-term stability of prosthetic fixtures. Prefabricated customized allogeneic blocks for augmentation may increase the fitting accuracy of the graft, decrease morbidity, and lower operation time in maxillary full-arch reconstruction. The percentage of resorption after 3 years is comparable to the commonly used iliac crest.

Citing Articles

Specially designed and CAD/CAM manufactured allogeneic bone blocks using for augmentation of a highly atrophic maxilla show a stable base for an all-on-six treatment concept: a case report.

Pfaffeneder-Mantai F, Meller O, Schneider B, Bloch J, Bytyqi D, Sutter W Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022; 44(1):21.

PMID: 35608728 PMC: 9130375. DOI: 10.1186/s40902-022-00351-9.


Customized Allogeneic Bone Augmentation Improves Esthetic Outcome in Anteromaxillary Dental Implantation.

Nilius M, Nilius M, Mueller C, Weiland B, Haim D, Krahe A Case Rep Dent. 2022; 2022:6943930.

PMID: 35360384 PMC: 8964193. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6943930.

References
1.
Jemt T . Regeneration of gingival papillae after single-implant treatment. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1997; 17(4):326-33. View

2.
Krasny M, Krasny K, Kaminski A, Fiedor P . Global maxillary ridge augmentation with frozen radiation-sterilised bone blocks followed by implant placement: a case report. Cell Tissue Bank. 2014; 16(1):35-41. PMC: 4334076. DOI: 10.1007/s10561-014-9452-y. View

3.
Froum S, Wallace S, Elian N, Cho S, Tarnow D . Comparison of mineralized cancellous bone allograft (Puros) and anorganic bovine bone matrix (Bio-Oss) for sinus augmentation: histomorphometry at 26 to 32 weeks after grafting. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2007; 26(6):543-51. View

4.
Nilius M, Kohlhase J, Lorenzen J, Lauer G, Schulz M . Multidisciplinary oral rehabilitation of an adolescent suffering from juvenile Gorlin-Goltz syndrome - a case report. Head Face Med. 2019; 15(1):5. PMC: 6367745. DOI: 10.1186/s13005-019-0189-5. View

5.
Vastardis S, Yukna R . Evaluation of allogeneic bone graft substitute for treatment of periodontal osseous defects: 6-month clinical results. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2006; 27(1):38-44. View