» Articles » PMID: 34373437

Safety Assessment of (formerly ) Plantarum Q180

Overview
Date 2021 Aug 10
PMID 34373437
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The safety of the probiotic strain Q180, which exerts postprandial lipid-lowering effects, was bioinformatically and phenotypically evaluated. The genome of strain Q180 was completely sequenced, and single circular chromosome of 3,197,263 bp without any plasmid was generated. Phylogenetic and related analyses using16S rRNA gene and whole-genome sequences revealed that strain Q180 is a member of (., formerly ) . Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes were bioinformatically analyzed using all genomes available in GenBank, which showed that AMR genes are present differently depending on strains. Bioinformatic analysis demonstrated that some mobile genetic elements such as prophages and insertion sequences were identified in the genome of strain Q180, but because they did not contain harmful genes such as AMR genes and virulence factor (VF)- and toxin-related genes, it was suggested that there is no transferability of harmful genes. The minimum inhibition concentrations of seven tested antibiotics suggested by the European Food Safety Authority guidelines were slightly lower than or equal to the microbiological cut-off values for . Strain Q180 did not show hemolytic and gelatinase activities and biogenic amine-producing ability. Taken together, this study demonstrated the safety of strain Q180 in terms of absence of AMR genes and VF- and toxin-related genes as a probiotic strain.

Citing Articles

Safety Assessment and Evaluation of Probiotic Potential of IDCC 3601 for Human Use.

Lee M, Bang W, Lee H, Yang S, Lee K, Kang H Microorganisms. 2024; 12(10).

PMID: 39458372 PMC: 11510087. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12102063.


Whole-Genome Sequencing of Three Strains Reveals Potential Metabolites for Boosting Host Immunity Safely.

Li I, Lee Y, Li T, Tsai Y, Chen Y, Chen C J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2024; 34(10):2079-2090.

PMID: 39263794 PMC: 11540610. DOI: 10.4014/jmb.2402.02013.


The Probiotic Properties and Safety of NK41 and NK46.

Lee J, Jo J, Seo H, Han S, Kim D Microorganisms. 2024; 12(4).

PMID: 38674720 PMC: 11052174. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12040776.


Characterization of Genomic, Physiological, and Probiotic Features of JS21 Strain Isolated from Traditional Fermented Jiangshui.

Liu Y, Wang S, Wang L, Lu H, Zhang T, Zeng W Foods. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38611386 PMC: 11011416. DOI: 10.3390/foods13071082.


Probiotic Potential and Safety Assessment of cqf-43 and Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis.

Liu B, Zhong X, Liu Z, Guan X, Wang Q, Qi R Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24(24).

PMID: 38139398 PMC: 10744225. DOI: 10.3390/ijms242417570.


References
1.
Liu Y, Liong M, Tsai Y . New perspectives of Lactobacillus plantarum as a probiotic: The gut-heart-brain axis. J Microbiol. 2018; 56(9):601-613. DOI: 10.1007/s12275-018-8079-2. View

2.
Mayrhofer S, van Hoek A, Mair C, Huys G, Aarts H, Kneifel W . Antibiotic susceptibility of members of the Lactobacillus acidophilus group using broth microdilution and molecular identification of their resistance determinants. Int J Food Microbiol. 2010; 144(1):81-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.08.024. View

3.
Kim K, Lee S, Chun B, Jeong S, Jeon C . Tetragenococcus halophilus MJ4 as a starter culture for repressing biogenic amine (cadaverine) formation during saeu-jeot (salted shrimp) fermentation. Food Microbiol. 2019; 82:465-473. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.02.017. View

4.
Li J, Ren F, Gu H, Li X, Gan B . Safety evaluation in vitro of Enterococcus durans from Tibetan traditional fermented yak milk. J Microbiol. 2011; 49(5):721-8. DOI: 10.1007/s12275-011-1062-9. View

5.
Beecher D, Schoeni J, Wong A . Enterotoxic activity of hemolysin BL from Bacillus cereus. Infect Immun. 1995; 63(11):4423-8. PMC: 173629. DOI: 10.1128/iai.63.11.4423-4428.1995. View