» Articles » PMID: 34371656

The Optical Properties of Leaf Structural Elements and Their Contribution to Photosynthetic Performance and Photoprotection

Overview
Journal Plants (Basel)
Date 2021 Aug 10
PMID 34371656
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Leaves have evolved to effectively harvest light, and, in parallel, to balance photosynthetic CO assimilation with water losses. At times, leaves must operate under light limiting conditions while at other instances (temporally distant or even within seconds), the same leaves must modulate light capture to avoid photoinhibition and achieve a uniform internal light gradient. The light-harvesting capacity and the photosynthetic performance of a given leaf are both determined by the organization and the properties of its structural elements, with some of these having evolved as adaptations to stressful environments. In this respect, the present review focuses on the optical roles of particular leaf structural elements (the light capture module) while integrating their involvement in other important functional modules. Superficial leaf tissues (epidermis including cuticle) and structures (epidermal appendages such as trichomes) play a crucial role against light interception. The epidermis, together with the cuticle, behaves as a reflector, as a selective UV filter and, in some cases, each epidermal cell acts as a lens focusing light to the interior. Non glandular trichomes reflect a considerable part of the solar radiation and absorb mainly in the UV spectral band. Mesophyll photosynthetic tissues and biominerals are involved in the efficient propagation of light within the mesophyll. Bundle sheath extensions and sclereids transfer light to internal layers of the mesophyll, particularly important in thick and compact leaves or in leaves with a flutter habit. All of the aforementioned structural elements have been typically optimized during evolution for multiple functions, thus offering adaptive advantages in challenging environments. Hence, each particular leaf design incorporates suitable optical traits advantageously and cost-effectively with the other fundamental functions of the leaf.

Citing Articles

MicroED: Unveiling the Structural Chemistry of Plant Biomineralisation.

Trzybinski D, Ziemniak M, Olech B, Sutula S, Goral T, Bemowska-Kalabun O Molecules. 2024; 29(20).

PMID: 39459285 PMC: 11510860. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29204916.


Optimizing vertical farm cultivation of L.: White Light's influence and nutrition management.

Voutsinos-Frantzis O, Savvas D, Liakopoulos G, Karavidas I, Ntanasi T, Sabatino L Heliyon. 2024; 10(17):e37146.

PMID: 39319117 PMC: 11419860. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37146.


Regulatory Mechanism through Which Old Soybean Leaves Respond to Mn Toxicity Stress.

Pan Y, Shi J, Li J, Zhang R, Xue Y, Liu Y Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(10).

PMID: 38791379 PMC: 11120821. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25105341.


Leaf cuticular wax composition of a genetically diverse collection of lettuce ( L.) cultivars evaluated under field conditions.

Luo W, Gonzalez E, Zarei A, Calleja S, Rozzi B, Demieville J Heliyon. 2024; 10(5):e27226.

PMID: 38463774 PMC: 10923717. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27226.


Small Papillae Regulated by SPD25 are Critical for Balancing Photosynthetic CO Assimilation and Water Loss in Rice.

Zhu L, Zeng F, Liang Y, Wang Q, Chen H, Feng P Rice (N Y). 2023; 16(1):58.

PMID: 38087150 PMC: 10716080. DOI: 10.1186/s12284-023-00676-7.


References
1.
Ollinger S . Sources of variability in canopy reflectance and the convergent properties of plants. New Phytol. 2010; 189(2):375-94. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03536.x. View

2.
Talhouet A, Meyer S, Baudin X, Streb P . Dynamic acclimation to sunlight in an alpine plant, Soldanella alpina L. Physiol Plant. 2019; 168(3):563-575. DOI: 10.1111/ppl.12982. View

3.
Liakopoulos G, Nikolopoulos D, Klouvatou A, Vekkos K, Manetas Y, Karabourniotis G . The photoprotective role of epidermal anthocyanins and surface pubescence in young leaves of grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Ann Bot. 2006; 98(1):257-65. PMC: 2803552. DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcl097. View

4.
Scoffoni C, Pou A, Aasamaa K, Sack L . The rapid light response of leaf hydraulic conductance: new evidence from two experimental methods. Plant Cell Environ. 2008; 31(12):1803-12. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01884.x. View

5.
Hideg E, Jansen M, Strid A . UV-B exposure, ROS, and stress: inseparable companions or loosely linked associates?. Trends Plant Sci. 2012; 18(2):107-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2012.09.003. View