» Articles » PMID: 34368274

Applications of Machine Learning for the Classification of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus Sublineages Using Amino Acid Scores of ORF5 Gene

Overview
Journal Front Vet Sci
Date 2021 Aug 9
PMID 34368274
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome is an infectious disease of pigs caused by PRRS virus (PRRSV). A modified live-attenuated vaccine has been widely used to control the spread of PRRSV and the classification of field strains is a key for a successful control and prevention. Restriction fragment length polymorphism targeting the Open reading frame 5 (ORF5) genes is widely used to classify PRRSV strains but showed unstable accuracy. Phylogenetic analysis is a powerful tool for PRRSV classification with consistent accuracy but it demands large computational power as the number of sequences gets increased. Our study aimed to apply four machine learning (ML) algorithms, random forest, k-nearest neighbor, support vector machine and multilayer perceptron, to classify field PRRSV strains into four clades using amino acid scores based on ORF5 gene sequence. Our study used amino acid sequences of ORF5 gene in 1931 field PRRSV strains collected in the US from 2012 to 2020. Phylogenetic analysis was used to labels field PRRSV strains into one of four clades: Lineage 5 or three clades in Linage 1. We measured accuracy and time consumption of classification using four ML approaches by different size of gene sequences. We found that all four ML algorithms classify a large number of field strains in a very short time (<2.5 s) with very high accuracy (>0.99 Area under curve of the Receiver of operating characteristics curve). Furthermore, the random forest approach detects a total of 4 key amino acid positions for the classification of field PRRSV strains into four clades. Our finding will provide an insightful idea to develop a rapid and accurate classification model using genetic information, which also enables us to handle large genome datasets in real time or semi-real time for data-driven decision-making and more timely surveillance.

Citing Articles

Classification of group A rotavirus VP7 and VP4 genotypes using random forest.

Tran H, Friendship R, Poljak Z Front Genet. 2023; 14:1029185.

PMID: 37323680 PMC: 10267748. DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1029185.


Comprehensive phylogeographic and phylodynamic analyses of global Senecavirus A.

Gao H, Chen Y, Xu X, Xu Z, Xu S, Xing J Front Microbiol. 2022; 13:980862.

PMID: 36246286 PMC: 9557172. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.980862.


Epidemiological survey of PRRS and genetic variation analysis of the ORF5 gene in Shandong Province, 2020-2021.

Li P, Shen Y, Wang T, Li J, Li Y, Zhao Y Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:987667.

PMID: 36187820 PMC: 9521713. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.987667.

References
1.
Cha S, Chang C, Yoon K . Instability of the restriction fragment length polymorphism pattern of open reading frame 5 of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus during sequential pig-to-pig passages. J Clin Microbiol. 2004; 42(10):4462-7. PMC: 522335. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4462-4467.2004. View

2.
Kim W, Kim J, Cha S, Wu W, Cooper V, Evans R . Significance of genetic variation of PRRSV ORF5 in virus neutralization and molecular determinants corresponding to cross neutralization among PRRS viruses. Vet Microbiol. 2012; 162(1):10-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.08.005. View

3.
Larsson A . AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics. 2014; 30(22):3276-8. PMC: 4221126. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu531. View

4.
Paploski I, Corzo C, Rovira A, Murtaugh M, Sanhueza J, Vilalta C . Temporal Dynamics of Co-circulating Lineages of Porcine Reproductive and Respiratory Syndrome Virus. Front Microbiol. 2019; 10:2486. PMC: 6839445. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02486. View

5.
Correas I, Osorio F, Steffen D, Pattnaik A, Vu H . Cross reactivity of immune responses to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection. Vaccine. 2017; 35(5):782-788. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.12.040. View