» Articles » PMID: 34366184

Anatomical and Physiological Characteristics in Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A Case-control Study Utilizing High-resolution Impedance Manometry

Overview
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2021 Aug 9
PMID 34366184
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background/purpose: This study aimed to explore the anatomical and physiological characteristics of patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) symptoms, such as hoarseness, throat clearing, throat pain, globus, and chronic cough, with the novel high-resolution impedance manometry (HRIM).

Methods: Consecutive patients exhibited at least one LPR symptom for ≥4 weeks after 2-month proton-pump inhibitor treatment were enrolled during November 2014 and March 2018 from single tertiary medical center. All patients completed validated symptom questionnaires, esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and HRIM. Healthy volunteers were also recruited for comparison of esophageal parameters on HRIM.

Results: Eighty-nine LPR patients and 63 healthy volunteers were analyzed. Compared with healthy volunteers, LPR patients had significantly shorter upper and lower esophageal sphincters (UES and LES), a shorter intraabdominal esophagus (all P < 0.01), higher 4-s integrated relaxation pressures (IRP-4s) (P = 0.011) of the LES. After adjusted for age, sex, body weight, body height and alcohol consumption, multiple regression analysis showed that age, LES IRP-4s and the UES length were independent risk factors for LPR symptoms (OR 1.056, 95% CI 1.019-1.094; OR 1.107, 95% CI 1.004-1.222; OR 0.432, 95% CI 0.254-0.736, respectively). In subgroup analysis, patients with moderate LPR symptoms had lower IRP-4s (6.64 ± 4.55 vs. 8.69 ± 5.10, P = 0.049) and more failed peristalsis (27.33 ± 29.26 vs. 11.36 ± 21.20, P = 0.004) than those with mild LPR symptoms.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that esophageal structural factors and LES IRP-4s may contribute to the occurrence of LPR symptoms. Patients with moderate LPR symptoms were more likely to present with failed peristalsis.

Citing Articles

Efficacy of dietary modifications and mucosal protectors in the treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux: a multicenter study.

Gelardi M, Giancaspro R, Fiorentino C, Patruno S, Marroni J, DAvino A Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 12:1488323.

PMID: 39931559 PMC: 11808125. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1488323.


Personalized Treatments Based on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient Profiles: A Narrative Review.

Lechien J J Pers Med. 2023; 13(11).

PMID: 38003882 PMC: 10671871. DOI: 10.3390/jpm13111567.


Dental Disorders and Salivary Changes in Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Casciaro S, Gelardi M, Giancaspro R, Quaranta V, Porro G, Sterlicchio B Diagnostics (Basel). 2022; 12(1).

PMID: 35054320 PMC: 8775268. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12010153.