» Articles » PMID: 34360271

Comprehensive Evaluation of Differential Methylation Analysis Methods for Bisulfite Sequencing Data

Overview
Publisher MDPI
Date 2021 Aug 7
PMID 34360271
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

With advances in next-generation sequencing technologies, the bisulfite conversion of genomic DNA followed by sequencing has become the predominant technique for quantifying genome-wide DNA methylation at single-base resolution. A large number of computational approaches are available in literature for identifying differentially methylated regions in bisulfite sequencing data, and more are being developed continuously. Here, we focused on a comprehensive evaluation of commonly used differential methylation analysis methods and describe the potential strengths and limitations of each method. We found that there are large differences among methods, and no single method consistently ranked first in all benchmarking. Moreover, smoothing seemed not to improve the performance greatly, and a small number of replicates created more difficulties in the computational analysis of BS-seq data than low sequencing depth. Data analysis and interpretation should be performed with great care, especially when the number of replicates or sequencing depth is limited.

Citing Articles

FAIRification of the DMRichR pipeline: advancing epigenetic research on environmental and evolutionary model organisms.

Salam W, Wojewodzic M, Frisch D Bioinform Adv. 2025; 5(1):vbaf024.

PMID: 40041115 PMC: 11879348. DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf024.


Integrative Multi-Omics Approaches for Identifying and Characterizing Biological Elements in Crop Traits: Current Progress and Future Prospects.

Fan B, Chen L, Chen L, Guo H Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(4).

PMID: 40003933 PMC: 11855028. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26041466.


MethyLasso: a segmentation approach to analyze DNA methylation patterns and identify differentially methylated regions from whole-genome datasets.

Balaramane D, Spill Y, Weber M, Bardet A Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(21):e98.

PMID: 39420630 PMC: 11602171. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae880.


Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing data analysis learning module on Google Cloud Platform.

Qin Y, Maggio A, Hawkins D, Beaudry L, Kim A, Pan D Brief Bioinform. 2024; 25(Supplement_1).

PMID: 39041913 PMC: 11264297. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae236.


Grafting based DNA methylation alteration of snoRNAs in upland cotton ( L.).

Karaca M, Ince A Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2024; 30(6):893-907.

PMID: 38974361 PMC: 11222342. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-024-01469-y.


References
1.
Saito Y, Tsuji J, Mituyama T . Bisulfighter: accurate detection of methylated cytosines and differentially methylated regions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(6):e45. PMC: 3973284. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1373. View

2.
Zhang Z, Jhaveri D, Marshall V, Bauer D, Edson J, Narayanan R . A comparative study of techniques for differential expression analysis on RNA-Seq data. PLoS One. 2014; 9(8):e103207. PMC: 4132098. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103207. View

3.
Kunde-Ramamoorthy G, Coarfa C, Laritsky E, Kessler N, Harris R, Xu M . Comparison and quantitative verification of mapping algorithms for whole-genome bisulfite sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014; 42(6):e43. PMC: 3973287. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkt1325. View

4.
Sun D, Xi Y, Rodriguez B, Park H, Tong P, Meong M . MOABS: model based analysis of bisulfite sequencing data. Genome Biol. 2014; 15(2):R38. PMC: 4054608. DOI: 10.1186/gb-2014-15-2-r38. View

5.
Robinson M, McCarthy D, Smyth G . edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2009; 26(1):139-40. PMC: 2796818. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616. View