» Articles » PMID: 34357796

Optimal Biopsy Approach for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

Overview
Journal Br J Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2021 Aug 6
PMID 34357796
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnostic and therapeutic work-up has evolved significantly in the last decade, with pre-biopsy multiparametric MRI now widely endorsed within international guidelines. There is potential to move away from the widespread use of systematic biopsy cores and towards an individualised risk-stratified approach. However, the evidence on the optimal biopsy approach remains heterogeneous, and the aim of this review is to highlight the most relevant features following a critical assessment of the literature. The commonest biopsy approaches are via the transperineal (TP) or transrectal (TR) routes. The former is considered more advantageous due to its negligible risk of post-procedural sepsis and reduced need for antimicrobial prophylaxis; the more recent development of local anaesthetic (LA) methods now makes this approach feasible in the clinic. Beyond this, several techniques are available, including cognitive registration, MRI-Ultrasound fusion imaging and direct MRI in-bore guided biopsy. Evidence shows that performing targeted biopsies reduces the number of cores required and can achieve acceptable rates of detection whilst helping to minimise complications and reducing pathologist workloads and costs to health-care facilities. Pre-biopsy MRI has revolutionised the diagnostic pathway for PCa, and optimising the biopsy process is now a focus. Combining MR imaging, TP biopsy and a more widespread use of LA in an outpatient setting seems a reasonable solution to balance health-care costs and benefits, however, local choices are likely to depend on the expertise and experience of clinicians and on the technology available.

Citing Articles

Epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of anterior prostate cancer.

Gharbieh S, Mullin J, Jaffer A, Chia D, Challacombe B Nat Rev Urol. 2025; .

PMID: 39875562 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-024-00992-7.


Prospective per-target analysis of the added value of the PrecisionPoint Transperineal Access System in cognitive prostate biopsy of MRI targets.

Orecchia L, Germani S, Colalillo G, Fasano A, Ricci M, Rosato E BJUI Compass. 2025; 5(12):1288-1298.

PMID: 39744072 PMC: 11685168. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.462.


Research progress on the role of lipoxygenase and its inhibitors in prostate cancer.

Li X, Mao J Future Oncol. 2024; 20(40):3549-3568.

PMID: 39535136 PMC: 11776861. DOI: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2419356.


A challenging diagnosis of prostate cancer seeding in the perineal needle-tract after transperineal biopsy: is PET-CT the imaging of choice?.

Fede Spicchiale C, De Leonardis F, Orecchia L, Germani S, Asimakopoulos A, Miano R Urol Case Rep. 2024; 57:102852.

PMID: 39398264 PMC: 11470588. DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2024.102852.


A Propensity Score-matched Comparison of Micro-ultrasound-guided Transrectal and Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion-guided Transperineal Prostate Biopsies for Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.

Piccolini A, Avolio P, Saitta C, Beatrici E, Moretto S, Aljoulani M Eur Urol Open Sci. 2024; 69:7-12.

PMID: 39314912 PMC: 11417145. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.08.013.


References
1.
Onik G, Miessau M, Bostwick D . Three-dimensional prostate mapping biopsy has a potentially significant impact on prostate cancer management. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27(26):4321-6. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.3497. View

2.
McGrath S, Christidis D, Clarebrough E, Ingle R, Perera M, Bolton D . Transperineal prostate biopsy - tips for analgesia. BJU Int. 2017; 120(2):164-167. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13859. View

3.
van Leenders G, van der Kwast T, Iczkowski K . The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology Consensus Conference on Prostate Cancer Grading. Eur Urol. 2020; 79(6):707-709. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.004. View

4.
Scott S, Samaratunga H, Chabert C, Breckenridge M, Gianduzzo T . Is transperineal prostate biopsy more accurate than transrectal biopsy in determining final Gleason score and clinical risk category? A comparative analysis. BJU Int. 2015; 116 Suppl 3:26-30. DOI: 10.1111/bju.13165. View

5.
Rosario D, Athene Lane J, Metcalfe C, Donovan J, Doble A, Goodwin L . Short term outcomes of prostate biopsy in men tested for cancer by prostate specific antigen: prospective evaluation within ProtecT study. BMJ. 2012; 344:d7894. PMC: 3253765. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.d7894. View