» Articles » PMID: 34357439

A Quantitative Analysis of Cerebellar Anatomy in Birds

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2021 Aug 6
PMID 34357439
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The cerebellum is largely conserved in its circuitry, but varies greatly in size and shape across species. The extent to which differences in cerebellar morphology is driven by changes in neuron numbers, neuron sizes or both, remains largely unknown. To determine how species variation in cerebellum size and shape is reflective of neuron sizes and numbers requires the development of a suitable comparative data set and one that can effectively separate different neuronal populations. Here, we generated the largest comparative dataset to date on neuron numbers, sizes, and volumes of cortical layers and surface area of the cerebellum across 54 bird species. Across different cerebellar sizes, the cortical layers maintained relatively constant proportions to one another and variation in cerebellum size was largely due to neuron numbers rather than neuron sizes. However, the rate at which neuron numbers increased with cerebellum size varied across Purkinje cells, granule cells, and cerebellar nuclei neurons. We also examined the relationship among neuron numbers, cerebellar surface area and cerebellar folding. Our estimate of cerebellar folding, the midsagittal foliation index, was a poor predictor of surface area and number of Purkinje cells, but surface area was the best predictor of Purkinje cell numbers. Overall, this represents the first comprehensive, quantitative analysis of cerebellar anatomy in a comparative context of any vertebrate. The extent to which these relationships occur in other vertebrates requires a similar approach and would determine whether the same scaling principles apply throughout the evolution of the cerebellum.

Citing Articles

Avian telencephalon and cerebellum volumes can be accurately estimated from digital brain endocasts.

Keirnan A, Cunha F, Citron S, Prideaux G, Iwaniuk A, Weisbecker V Biol Lett. 2025; 21(1):20240596.

PMID: 39837487 PMC: 11750377. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0596.


Why birds are smart.

Gunturkun O, Pusch R, Rose J Trends Cogn Sci. 2023; 28(3):197-209.

PMID: 38097447 PMC: 10940863. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2023.11.002.


Diversity and evolution of cerebellar folding in mammals.

Heuer K, Traut N, de Sousa A, Valk S, Clavel J, Toro R Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37737580 PMC: 10617990. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.85907.


Neuronal and non-neuronal scaling across brain regions within an intercross of domestic and wild chickens.

Cunha F, Stingo-Hirmas D, Cardoso R, Wright D, Henriksen R Front Neuroanat. 2022; 16:1048261.

PMID: 36506870 PMC: 9732670. DOI: 10.3389/fnana.2022.1048261.


Proportional Cerebellum Size Predicts Fear Habituation in Chickens.

Stingo-Hirmas D, Cunha F, Cardoso R, Carra L, Ronnegard L, Wright D Front Physiol. 2022; 13:826178.

PMID: 35250629 PMC: 8891606. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.826178.

References
1.
Apps R, Hawkes R . Cerebellar cortical organization: a one-map hypothesis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009; 10(9):670-81. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2698. View

2.
Apps R, Hawkes R, Aoki S, Bengtsson F, Brown A, Chen G . Cerebellar Modules and Their Role as Operational Cerebellar Processing Units: A Consensus paper [corrected]. Cerebellum. 2018; 17(5):654-682. PMC: 6132822. DOI: 10.1007/s12311-018-0952-3. View

3.
Chang W, Pedroni A, Hohendorf V, Giacomello S, Hibi M, Koster R . Functionally distinct Purkinje cell types show temporal precision in encoding locomotion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(29):17330-17337. PMC: 7382291. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2005633117. View

4.
Cooper A, Stanford I . Electrophysiological and morphological characteristics of three subtypes of rat globus pallidus neurone in vitro. J Physiol. 2000; 527 Pt 2:291-304. PMC: 2270075. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00291.x. View

5.
Corfield J, Birkhead T, Spottiswoode C, Iwaniuk A, Boogert N, Gutierrez-Ibanez C . Brain size and morphology of the brood-parasitic and cerophagous honeyguides (Aves: Piciformes). Brain Behav Evol. 2013; 81(3):170-86. DOI: 10.1159/000348834. View