» Articles » PMID: 34357188

Effect of Acid Flow Rate, Membrane Surface Area, and Capture Solution on the Effectiveness of Suspended GPM Systems to Recover Ammonia

Overview
Date 2021 Aug 6
PMID 34357188
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ammonia losses from manure pose serious problems for ecosystems and human and animal health. Gas-permeable membranes (GPMs) constitute a promising approach to address the challenge of reducing farm ammonia emissions and to attain the EU's Clean Air Package goals. In this study, the effect of NH-N concentration, membrane surface area, acid flux, and type of capture solution on ammonia recovery was investigated for a suspended GPM system through three experiments, in which ammonia was released from a synthetic solution (NHCl + NaHCO + allylthiourea). The effect of two surface areas (81.7 and 163.4 cm) was first evaluated using three different synthetic N emitting concentrations (3000, 6000, and 12,000 mg NH-N∙L) and keeping the flow of acidic solution (1N HSO) constant (0.8 L·h). A direct relationship was found between the amount of NH captured and the NH-N concentration in the N-emitting solution, and between the amount of NH captured and the membrane surface area at the two lowest concentrations. Nonetheless, the use of a larger membrane surface barely improved ammonia capture at the highest concentration, pointing to the existence of other limiting factors. Hence, ammonia capture was then studied using different acid flow rates (0.8, 1.3, 1.6, and 2.1 L∙h) at a fixed N emitting concentration of 6000 mg NH-N∙L and a surface area of 122.5 cm. A higher acid flow rate (0.8-2.1 L∙h) resulted in a substantial increase in ammonia absorption, from 165 to 262 mg of NH∙d over a 14-day period. Taking the parameters that led to the best results in experiments 1 and 2, different types of ammonia capture solutions (HSO, water and carbonated water) were finally compared under refrigeration conditions (at 2 °C). A high NH recovery (81% in 7 days), comparable to that obtained with the HSO solution (88%), was attained when chilled water was used as the capture solution. The presented results point to the need to carefully optimize the emitter concentration, flow rate, and type of capture solution to maximize the effectiveness of suspended GPM systems, and suggest that chilled water may be used as an alternative to conventional acidic solutions, with associated savings.

Citing Articles

Comparison of the Ammonia Trapping Performance of Different Gas-Permeable Tubular Membrane System Configurations.

Soto-Herranz M, Sanchez-Bascones M, Garcia-Gonzalez M, Martin-Ramos P Membranes (Basel). 2022; 12(11).

PMID: 36363659 PMC: 9699080. DOI: 10.3390/membranes12111104.


Evaluation of Different Capture Solutions for Ammonia Recovery in Suspended Gas Permeable Membrane Systems.

Soto-Herranz M, Sanchez-Bascones M, Antolin-Rodriguez J, Martin-Ramos P Membranes (Basel). 2022; 12(6).

PMID: 35736280 PMC: 9228927. DOI: 10.3390/membranes12060572.


Pilot Plant for the Capture of Ammonia from the Atmosphere of Pig and Poultry Farms Using Gas-Permeable Membrane Technology.

Soto-Herranz M, Sanchez-Bascones M, Antolin-Rodriguez J, Martin-Ramos P Membranes (Basel). 2021; 11(11).

PMID: 34832089 PMC: 8622955. DOI: 10.3390/membranes11110859.

References
1.
Ahn Y, Hwang Y, Shin H . Application of PTFE membrane for ammonia removal in a membrane contactor. Water Sci Technol. 2011; 63(12):2944-8. DOI: 10.2166/wst.2011.141. View

2.
Brennan B, Briciu-Burghina C, Hickey S, Abadie T, Al Ma Awali S, Delaure Y . Pilot Scale Study: First Demonstration of Hydrophobic Membranes for the Removal of Ammonia Molecules from Rendering Condensate Wastewater. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(11). PMC: 7312626. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21113914. View

3.
Jamaludin Z, Rollings-Scattergood S, Lutes K, Vaneeckhaute C . Evaluation of sustainable scrubbing agents for ammonia recovery from anaerobic digestate. Bioresour Technol. 2018; 270:596-602. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.09.007. View

4.
Dai X, Blanes-Vidal V . Emissions of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide from swine wastewater during and after acidification treatment: effect of pH, mixing and aeration. J Environ Manage. 2012; 115:147-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.019. View

5.
Garcia-Gonzalez M, Vanotti M . Recovery of ammonia from swine manure using gas-permeable membranes: effect of waste strength and pH. Waste Manag. 2015; 38:455-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.021. View