» Articles » PMID: 34356494

Molecular and Pathological Profiling of Corresponding Treatment-Naïve and Neoadjuvant Pazopanib-Treated High-Risk Soft Tissue Sarcoma Samples of the GISG-04/NOPASS Study

Overview
Journal Biology (Basel)
Publisher MDPI
Specialty Biology
Date 2021 Aug 6
PMID 34356494
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the framework of the German Interdisciplinary Sarcoma Group GISG-04/NOPASS trial, we evaluated soft tissue sarcoma samples taken before and after neoadjuvant pazopanib therapy using histopathology and next generation sequencing (NGS) to find potential predictive biomarkers. We also aimed to improve the genetically based sarcoma classification and to elucidate additional potentially druggable mutations. In total, 30 tumor samples from 18 patients consisting of 12 pre-therapeutic biopsies and 18 resection specimens following neoadjuvant pazopanib therapy were available for analyses. NGS was performed with the Oncomine Focus Assay (Ion Torrent) covering 0.03 Mb of DNA and enabled the detection of genetic variants in 52 cancer-relevant genes. Pathological analysis showed significant regression (≥50%) after pazopanib treatment in only one undifferentiated (pleomorphic) sarcoma. NGS analyses revealed a very high frequency of amplification (88%; 7/8) in the group of dedifferentiated liposarcoma. In addition, two potentially druggable mutations, a missense mutation (E203K) and a missense mutation (V600E), were traceable in two undifferentiated (pleomorphic) sarcoma patients (11%; 2/18). Our findings demonstrate that NGS testing is a powerful technology helping to improve diagnostic accuracy and offering some patients the chance for personalized medicine even in a "mutation unlikely" cohort like STS.

References
1.
Samuels B, Chawla S, Somaiah N, Staddon A, Skubitz K, Milhem M . Results of a prospective phase 2 study of pazopanib in patients with advanced intermediate-grade or high-grade liposarcoma. Cancer. 2017; 123(23):4640-4647. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30926. View

2.
Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz L, Sargent D, Ford R . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2008; 45(2):228-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. View

3.
Zhu J, Li C, Yang H, Guo X, Huang T, Han W . Computational Study on the Effect of Inactivating/Activating Mutations on the Inhibition of MEK1 by Trametinib. Int J Mol Sci. 2020; 21(6). PMC: 7139317. DOI: 10.3390/ijms21062167. View

4.
Mitsis D, Opyrchal M, Zhao Y, Kane Iii J, Cheney R, Salerno K . Exceptional Clinical Response to BRAF-Targeted Therapy in a Patient with Metastatic Sarcoma. Cureus. 2016; 7(12):e439. PMC: 4731329. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.439. View

5.
Tanaka K, Ozaki T . New TNM classification (AJCC eighth edition) of bone and soft tissue sarcomas: JCOG Bone and Soft Tissue Tumor Study Group. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2018; 49(2):103-107. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyy157. View