Scent of a Woman-Or Man: Odors Influence Person Knowledge

Overview

Journal Brain Sci

Publisher MDPI

Date 2021 Aug 6

PMID 34356189

Citations 1

Authors

Nicole L Hovis

Paul R Sheehe

Theresa L White

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

First impressions of social traits are regularly, rapidly, and readily determined from limited information about another individual. Relatively little is known about the way that olfactory information, particularly from scents that are not body odors, alters a first impression. Can the attributes of an odorant be conferred onto a person associated with that scent? To explore this, 101 participants were asked to form an impression of a hypothetical person based on the following stimuli: A gender-neutral silhouette, a list of six personal characteristics, and one of five odorants. Participants then rated the likelihood that the hypothetical person possessed each of 51 personality traits that were determined a priori as falling into six attribute categories. Participants also directly rated all odorants for the six categories and intensity. A T-test showed that ratings of the hypothetical person were less disparate from the odor that was presented during impression formation than from other odors. ANOVA revealed that the effects were heterogeneous, with odorants varying in their effectiveness in associating the hypothetical person with categories. The present data suggest that a hypothetical person can be imbued with the specific attributes of an odor and that some odors are better at contributing to impressions than others.

Citing Articles

Is That "Mr." or "Ms." Lemon? An Investigation of Grammatical and Semantic Gender on the Perception of Household Odorants.

White T, Cunningham C, Zampini M Brain Sci. 2022; 12(10).

PMID: 36291247 PMC: 9599107. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12101313.

References

LINKE C . A study of pitch characteristics of female voices and their relationship to vocal effectiveness. Folia Phoniatr (Basel). 1973; 25(3):173-85. DOI: 10.1159/000263685. View

Hold B, Schleidt M . The importance of human odour in non-verbal communication. Z Tierpsychol. 1977; 43(3):225-38. DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1977.tb00072.x. View

Sarolidou G, Axelsson J, Kimball B, Sundelin T, Regenbogen C, Lundstrom J . People expressing olfactory and visual cues of disease are less liked. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 375(1800):20190272. PMC: 7209934. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0272. View

Bar M, Neta M, Linz H . Very first impressions. Emotion. 2006; 6(2):269-78. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.269. View

Tong F, Nakayama K, Moscovitch M, Weinrib O, Kanwisher N . Response properties of the human fusiform face area. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2010; 17(1):257-80. DOI: 10.1080/026432900380607. View

Lubke K, Croy I, Hoenen M, Gerber J, Pause B, Hummel T . Does human body odor represent a significant and rewarding social signal to individuals high in social openness?. PLoS One. 2014; 9(4):e94314. PMC: 3981800. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094314. View

Hoffmann H . The aroma of arousal: Effects of menstrual cycle phase and women's sexual arousal state on men's responsiveness to women's body odor. Biol Psychol. 2019; 142:54-61. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2019.01.012. View

de Groot J, Semin G, Smeets M . On the Communicative Function of Body Odors. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017; 12(2):306-324. DOI: 10.1177/1745691616676599. View

Havlicek J, Lenochova P . The effect of meat consumption on body odor attractiveness. Chem Senses. 2006; 31(8):747-52. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjl017. View

10.

Gaby J, Zayas V . Smelling is Telling: Human Olfactory Cues Influence Social Judgments in Semi-Realistic Interactions. Chem Senses. 2017; 42(5):405-418. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjx012. View

11.

Leone C, Robertson K . Some effects of sex-linked clothing and gender schema on the stereotyping of infants. J Soc Psychol. 1989; 129(5):609-19. DOI: 10.1080/00224545.1989.9713779. View

12.

Doty R, Green P, Ram C, Yankell S . Communication of gender from human breath odors: relationship to perceived intensity and pleasantness. Horm Behav. 1982; 16(1):13-22. DOI: 10.1016/0018-506x(82)90002-2. View

13.

Lim J, Wood A, Green B . Derivation and evaluation of a labeled hedonic scale. Chem Senses. 2009; 34(9):739-51. PMC: 2762053. DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjp054. View

14.

Wright D, Sladden B . An own gender bias and the importance of hair in face recognition. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2003; 114(1):101-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(03)00052-0. View

15.

Sorokowska A, Oleszkiewicz A . Body-odor based assessments of sex and personality - Non-significant differences between blind and sighted odor raters. Physiol Behav. 2019; 210:112573. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112573. View

16.

Bem S . The measurement of psychological androgyny. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1974; 42(2):155-62. View

17.

Kraft-Todd G, Reinero D, Kelley J, Heberlein A, Baer L, Riess H . Empathic nonverbal behavior increases ratings of both warmth and competence in a medical context. PLoS One. 2017; 12(5):e0177758. PMC: 5432110. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177758. View

18.

Doty R, Orndorff M, Leyden J, KLIGMAN A . Communication of gender from human axillary odors: relationship to perceived intensity and hedonicity. Behav Biol. 1978; 23(3):373-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0091-6773(78)91393-7. View

19.

Lenochova P, Vohnoutova P, Roberts S, Oberzaucher E, Grammer K, Havlicek J . Psychology of fragrance use: perception of individual odor and perfume blends reveals a mechanism for idiosyncratic effects on fragrance choice. PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e33810. PMC: 3314678. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033810. View

20.

Semin G, de Groot J . The chemical bases of human sociality. Trends Cogn Sci. 2013; 17(9):427-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.05.008. View