» Articles » PMID: 34349691

Multiple Hazard Uncertainty Visualization Challenges and Paths Forward

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2021 Aug 5
PMID 34349691
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Making decisions with uncertainty is challenging for the general public, policymakers, and even highly trained scientists. Nevertheless, when faced with the need to respond to a potential hazard, people must make high-risk decisions with uncertainty. In some cases, people have to consider multiple hazards with various types of uncertainties. Multiple hazards can be interconnected by location, time, and/or environmental systems, and the hazards may interact, producing complex relationships among their associated uncertainties. The interaction between multiple hazards and their uncertainties can have nonlinear effects, where the resultant risk and uncertainty are greater than the sum of the risk and uncertainty associated with individual hazards. Effectively communicating the uncertainties related to such complicated systems should be a high priority because the frequency and variability of multiple hazard events due to climate change continue to increase. However, the communication of multiple hazard uncertainties and their interactions remains largely unexplored. The lack of practical guidance on conveying multiple hazard uncertainties is likely due in part to the field's vast expanse, making it challenging to identify entry points. Here, we offer a perspective on three critical challenges related to uncertainty communication across various multiple hazard contexts to galvanize the research community. We advocate for systematic considerations of multiple hazard uncertainty communication that focus on trade-offs between complexity and factors, including mental effort, trust, and usability.

References
1.
van der Bles A, van der Linden S, Freeman A, Mitchell J, Galvao A, Zaval L . Communicating uncertainty about facts, numbers and science. R Soc Open Sci. 2019; 6(5):181870. PMC: 6549952. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181870. View

2.
Padilla L, Creem-Regehr S, Hegarty M, Stefanucci J . Decision making with visualizations: a cognitive framework across disciplines. Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2018; 3:29. PMC: 6091269. DOI: 10.1186/s41235-018-0120-9. View

3.
van der Bles A, van der Linden S, Freeman A, Spiegelhalter D . The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020; 117(14):7672-7683. PMC: 7149229. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1913678117. View

4.
Fiske S, Cuddy A, Glick P . Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence. Trends Cogn Sci. 2006; 11(2):77-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005. View

5.
Padilla L, Powell M, Kay M, Hullman J . Uncertain About Uncertainty: How Qualitative Expressions of Forecaster Confidence Impact Decision-Making With Uncertainty Visualizations. Front Psychol. 2021; 11:579267. PMC: 7868089. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579267. View