» Articles » PMID: 34340656

Stage- and Sex-specific Transcriptome Analyses Reveal Distinctive Sensory Gene Expression Patterns in a Butterfly

Overview
Journal BMC Genomics
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Genetics
Date 2021 Aug 3
PMID 34340656
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Animal behavior is largely driven by the information that animals are able to extract and process from their environment. However, the function and organization of sensory systems often change throughout ontogeny, particularly in animals that undergo indirect development. As an initial step toward investigating these ontogenetic changes at the molecular level, we characterized the sensory gene repertoire and examined the expression profiles of genes linked to vision and chemosensation in two life stages of an insect that goes through metamorphosis, the butterfly Bicyclus anynana.

Results: Using RNA-seq, we compared gene expression in the heads of late fifth instar larvae and newly eclosed adults that were reared under identical conditions. Over 50 % of all expressed genes were differentially expressed between the two developmental stages, with 4,036 genes upregulated in larval heads and 4,348 genes upregulated in adult heads. In larvae, upregulated vision-related genes were biased toward those involved with eye development, while phototransduction genes dominated the vision genes that were upregulated in adults. Moreover, the majority of the chemosensory genes we identified in the B. anynana genome were differentially expressed between larvae and adults, several of which share homology with genes linked to pheromone detection, host plant recognition, and foraging in other species of Lepidoptera.

Conclusions: These results revealed promising candidates for furthering our understanding of sensory processing and behavior in the disparate developmental stages of butterflies and other animals that undergo metamorphosis.

Citing Articles

Genome assembly of a nocturnal butterfly (Macrosoma leucophasiata) reveals convergent adaptation of visual genes.

Singh R, Weng Y, Sondhi Y, Plotkin D, Frandsen P, Kawahara A Commun Biol. 2024; 7(1):1664.

PMID: 39702780 PMC: 11659621. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-024-07124-2.


The genome and sex-dependent responses to temperature in the common yellow butterfly, Eurema hecabe.

Lee I, Nong W, So W, Cheung C, Xie Y, Baril T BMC Biol. 2023; 21(1):200.

PMID: 37749565 PMC: 10521528. DOI: 10.1186/s12915-023-01703-1.


Evidence for a single, ancient origin of a genus-wide alternative life history strategy.

Tunstrom K, Woronik A, Hanly J, Rastas P, Chichvarkhin A, Warren A Sci Adv. 2023; 9(12):eabq3713.

PMID: 36947619 PMC: 10032607. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abq3713.


Mosaic Evolution of Molecular Pathways for Sex Pheromone Communication in a Butterfly.

Nieberding C, Beldade P, Baumle V, San Martin G, Arun A, Lognay G Genes (Basel). 2022; 13(8).

PMID: 36011283 PMC: 9407440. DOI: 10.3390/genes13081372.


Development of dim-light vision in the nocturnal reef fish family Holocentridae. I: Retinal gene expression.

Fogg L, Cortesi F, Lecchini D, Gache C, Marshall N, de Busserolles F J Exp Biol. 2022; 225(17).

PMID: 35929500 PMC: 9482368. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.244513.

References
1.
Nadeau N, Pardo-Diaz C, Whibley A, Supple M, Saenko S, Wallbank R . The gene cortex controls mimicry and crypsis in butterflies and moths. Nature. 2016; 534(7605):106-10. PMC: 5094491. DOI: 10.1038/nature17961. View

2.
Benton R, Vannice K, Vosshall L . An essential role for a CD36-related receptor in pheromone detection in Drosophila. Nature. 2007; 450(7167):289-93. DOI: 10.1038/nature06328. View

3.
Chang H, Ai D, Zhang J, Dong S, Liu Y, Wang G . Candidate odorant binding proteins and chemosensory proteins in the larval chemosensory tissues of two closely related noctuidae moths, Helicoverpa armigera and H. assulta. PLoS One. 2017; 12(6):e0179243. PMC: 5464669. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179243. View

4.
Anders S, Pyl P, Huber W . HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2014; 31(2):166-9. PMC: 4287950. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. View

5.
Ha T, Smith D . Odorant and pheromone receptors in insects. Front Cell Neurosci. 2009; 3:10. PMC: 2759369. DOI: 10.3389/neuro.03.010.2009. View