» Articles » PMID: 34335631

CD4+CD25+CD127-Foxp3+ and CD8+CD28- Tregs in Renal Transplant Recipients: Phenotypic Patterns, Association With Immunosuppressive Drugs, and Interaction With Effector CD8+ T Cells and CD19+IL-10+ Bregs

Overview
Journal Front Immunol
Date 2021 Aug 2
PMID 34335631
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Gaps still exist regarding knowledge on regulatory cells in transplant recipients. We studied the phenotypic patterns of CD4+, CD8+CD28- Tregs, and CD19+IL-10+ Bregs in the blood of healthy controls (HC), end-stage kidney disease patients (ESKD), early and late stable renal transplant recipients (Tx), and transplant recipients with steroid-treated acute cellular rejection 1 week-3 months after successful treatment. We also investigated the relationship between immunosuppressive drugs and the aforementioned regulatory cells in transplant recipients.

Methods: We recruited 32 HC, 83 ESKD, 51 early Tx, 95 late Tx, and 9 transplant patients with a recent steroid-treated acute cellular rejection. Besides CD19+IL-10+ Bregs, we analyzed absolute and relative frequencies of CD4+CD25+CD127-Foxp3+ Tregs and CD8+CD28- Tregs and their expression of IL-10, TGF-ß, IFN-g, and Helios.

Results: We found a negative correlation between absolute CD4+CD25+CD127-Foxp3+ Treg and relative CD19+IL-10+ Breg frequencies in early Tx recipients (r=-0.433, =0.015, n=31). In that group, absolute CD4+CD25+CD127-Foxp3+ Tregs were negatively associated with steroid dose and tacrolimus trough levels (r=-0.377, = 0.021, n=37; r=-0.43, =0.033, n=25, respectively), opposite to IL-10+ Bregs, whose frequency apparently was not negatively affected by potent immunosuppression early posttransplant. We found also lower CD4+CD25+CD127-Foxp3+ Tregs in patients treated with basiliximab or rATG as compared with ESKD patients (=0.001 and 0.001, respectively). No difference in absolute IL-10+ Bregs could be detected among these 3 patient groups. Early Tx recipients showed lower CD4+CD25+CD127-Foxp3+ Tregs within 3 months of antibody induction than after 3 months ( = 0.034), whereas IL-10+ Bregs showed higher relative counts during the first 3 months post antibody induction than after 3 months ( = 0.022). Our findings suggest that IL-10+ Bregs decrease with time posttransplantation independent of the effect of antibody induction and dose of other immunosuppressive drugs.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that CD19+IL-10+ Bregs and CD4+CD25+CD127-Foxp3+ Tregs behave in opposite ways during the early posttransplant period, possibly due to a predominant negative impact of high doses of immunosuppressants on Tregs. CD19+IL-10+Bregs do not seem to be suppressed by antibody induction and early potent immunosuppression with chemical drugs.

Citing Articles

Impact of immunosuppressants on tumor pulmonary metastasis: new insight into transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Chen J, Li H, Zhuo J, Lin Z, Hu Z, He C Cancer Biol Med. 2024; 21(11.

PMID: 39718153 PMC: 11667780. DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2024.0267.


Regulatory T cells in immune checkpoint blockade antitumor therapy.

Zhang A, Fan T, Liu Y, Yu G, Li C, Jiang Z Mol Cancer. 2024; 23(1):251.

PMID: 39516941 PMC: 11545879. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-024-02156-y.


Evaluation of Regulatory B Cell Subpopulations CD24++CD38++, CD24++CD27+, Plasmablasts and Their Correlation with T Regs CD3+CD4+CD25+FOXP3+ in Dialysis Patients and Early Post-Transplant Rejection-Free Kidney Recipients.

Fouza A, Fylaktou A, Tagkouta A, Daoudaki M, Vagiotas L, Kasimatis E J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892795 PMC: 11173263. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113080.


Treg in inborn errors of immunity: gaps, knowns and future perspectives.

Kennedy-Batalla R, Acevedo D, Luo Y, Esteve-Sole A, Vlagea A, Correa-Rocha R Front Immunol. 2024; 14:1278759.

PMID: 38259469 PMC: 10800401. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1278759.


Regulatory T cells in skin regeneration and wound healing.

Knoedler S, Knoedler L, Kauke-Navarro M, Rinkevich Y, Hundeshagen G, Harhaus L Mil Med Res. 2023; 10(1):49.

PMID: 37867188 PMC: 10591349. DOI: 10.1186/s40779-023-00484-6.


References
1.
Posnett D, Edinger J, Manavalan J, Irwin C, Marodon G . Differentiation of human CD8 T cells: implications for in vivo persistence of CD8+ CD28- cytotoxic effector clones. Int Immunol. 1999; 11(2):229-41. DOI: 10.1093/intimm/11.2.229. View

2.
Daniel V, Wang H, Sadeghi M, Opelz G . Interferon-gamma producing regulatory T cells as a diagnostic and therapeutic tool in organ transplantation. Int Rev Immunol. 2013; 33(3):195-211. DOI: 10.3109/08830185.2013.845181. View

3.
Sakaguchi S, Wing K, Onishi Y, Prieto-Martin P, Yamaguchi T . Regulatory T cells: how do they suppress immune responses?. Int Immunol. 2009; 21(10):1105-11. DOI: 10.1093/intimm/dxp095. View

4.
Campbell D, Koch M . Phenotypical and functional specialization of FOXP3+ regulatory T cells. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011; 11(2):119-30. PMC: 3289970. DOI: 10.1038/nri2916. View

5.
Cortesini R, LeMaoult J, Ciubotariu R, Cortesini N . CD8+CD28- T suppressor cells and the induction of antigen-specific, antigen-presenting cell-mediated suppression of Th reactivity. Immunol Rev. 2001; 182:201-6. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-065x.2001.1820116.x. View