» Articles » PMID: 34335353

Differences in Facial Expression Recognition Between Unipolar and Bipolar Depression

Overview
Journal Front Psychol
Date 2021 Aug 2
PMID 34335353
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To explore the differences in facial emotion recognition among patients with unipolar depression (UD), bipolar depression (BD), and normal controls.

Methods: Thirty patients with UD and 30 patients with BD, respectively, were recruited in Zhumadian Second People's Hospital from July 2018 to August 2019. Fifteen groups of facial expressions including happiness, sadness, anger, surprise, fear, and disgust were identified.

Results: A single-factor ANOVA was used to analyze the facial expression recognition results of the three groups, and the differences were found in the happy-sad ( = 0.009), happy-angry ( = 0.001), happy-surprised ( = 0.034), and disgust-surprised ( = 0.038) facial expression groups. The independent sample -test analysis showed that compared with the normal control group, there were differences in the happy-sad ( = 0.009) and happy-angry ( = 0.009) groups in patients with BD, and the accuracy of facial expression recognition was lower than the normal control group. Compared with patients with UD, there were differences between the happy-sad ( = 0.005) and happy-angry ( = 0.002) groups, and the identification accuracy of patients with UD was higher than that of patients with BD. The time of facial expression recognition in the normal control group was shorter than that in the patient group. Using happiness-sadness to distinguish unipolar and BDs, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) is 0.933, the specificity is 0.889, and the sensitivity is 0.667. Using happiness-anger to distinguish unipolar and BD, the AUC was 0.733, the specificity was 0.778, and the sensitivity was 0.600.

Conclusion: Patients with UD had lower performance in recognizing negative expressions and had longer recognition times. Those with BD had lower accuracy in recognizing positive expressions and longer recognition times. Rapid facial expression recognition performance may be as a potential endophenotype for early identification of unipolar and BD.

Citing Articles

Relationship between low mood and micro-expression processing: evidence of negative bias in interpreting fleeting facial expressions.

Wezowski K, Penton-Voak I R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(7):231944.

PMID: 39086818 PMC: 11288663. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231944.


Working memory updating in individuals with bipolar and unipolar depression: fMRI study.

Manelis A, Halchenko Y, Bonar L, Stiffler R, Satz S, Miceli R Transl Psychiatry. 2022; 12(1):441.

PMID: 36220840 PMC: 9553934. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-022-02211-6.

References
1.
Neves M, Albuquerque M, Malloy-Diniz L, Nicolato R, Neves F, de Souza-Duran F . A voxel-based morphometry study of gray matter correlates of facial emotion recognition in bipolar disorder. Psychiatry Res. 2015; 233(2):158-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2015.05.009. View

2.
OConnor J, Robinson S, Waterton J . Imaging tumour hypoxia with oxygen-enhanced MRI and BOLD MRI. Br J Radiol. 2018; 92(1095):20180642. PMC: 6540855. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20180642. View

3.
Leppanen J, Nelson C . The development and neural bases of facial emotion recognition. Adv Child Dev Behav. 2006; 34:207-46. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2407(06)80008-x. View

4.
Dalili M, Penton-Voak I, Harmer C, Munafo M . Meta-analysis of emotion recognition deficits in major depressive disorder. Psychol Med. 2014; 45(6):1135-44. PMC: 4712476. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291714002591. View

5.
Ory S, Le Jeune F, Haegelen C, Vicente S, Philippot P, Dondaine T . Pre-frontal-insular-cerebellar modifications correlate with disgust feeling blunting after subthalamic stimulation: A positron emission tomography study in Parkinson's disease. J Neuropsychol. 2015; 11(3):378-395. DOI: 10.1111/jnp.12094. View