» Articles » PMID: 34335003

Effect of Parameterization on Statistical Power and Effect Size Estimation in Latent Growth Modeling

Overview
Date 2021 Aug 2
PMID 34335003
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The difference between groups in their random slopes is frequently examined in latent growth modeling to evaluate treatment efficacy. However, when end centering is used for model parameterization with a randomized design, the difference in the random intercepts is the model-estimated mean difference between the groups at the end of the study, which has the same expected value as the product of the coefficient for the slope difference and study duration. A Monte Carlo study found that (a) the statistical power to detect the treatment effect was greater when determined from the intercept instead of the slope difference, and (b) the standard error of the model-estimated mean difference was smaller when obtained from the intercept difference. Investigators may reduce Type II errors by comparing groups in random intercepts instead of random slopes to test treatment effects, and should therefore conduct power assessments using end centering to detect each difference.

Citing Articles

Trajectories of episodic memory in midlife: Historical change from a cross-country perspective.

Wettstein M, Infurna F, Dey N, Cruz-Carrillo Y, Grimm K, Lachman M Psychol Aging. 2024; 40(2):197-217.

PMID: 39679986 PMC: 11875983. DOI: 10.1037/pag0000870.


Loneliness in midlife: Historical increases and elevated levels in the United States compared with Europe.

Infurna F, Dey N, Gonzalez Aviles T, Grimm K, Lachman M, Gerstorf D Am Psychol. 2024; .

PMID: 38497781 PMC: 11758892. DOI: 10.1037/amp0001322.


Regression-Equivalent Effect Sizes for Latent Growth Modeling and Associated Null Hypothesis Significance Tests.

Feingold A Struct Equ Modeling. 2023; 30(4):672-685.

PMID: 37588162 PMC: 10427122. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2022.2139702.

References
1.
Kelley K, Preacher K . On effect size. Psychol Methods. 2012; 17(2):137-52. DOI: 10.1037/a0028086. View

2.
Feingold A, Tiberio S, Capaldi D . New approaches for examining associations with latent categorical variables: applications to substance abuse and aggression. Psychol Addict Behav. 2013; 28(1):257-67. PMC: 3823694. DOI: 10.1037/a0031487. View

3.
Parra-Cardona J, Bybee D, Sullivan C, Domenech Rodriguez M, Dates B, Tams L . Examining the impact of differential cultural adaptation with Latina/o immigrants exposed to adapted parent training interventions. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017; 85(1):58-71. PMC: 5215866. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000160. View

4.
Raudenbush S . Effects of study duration, frequency of observation, and sample size on power in studies of group differences in polynomial change. Psychol Methods. 2002; 6(4):387-401. View

5.
Stice E, Rohde P, Shaw H, Gau J . Clinician-led, peer-led, and internet-delivered dissonance-based eating disorder prevention programs: Acute effectiveness of these delivery modalities. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017; 85(9):883-895. PMC: 5578897. DOI: 10.1037/ccp0000211. View