» Articles » PMID: 34334040

Long-term Competing Risks for Overall and Cause-specific Failure of Rotating-hinge Distal Femoral Arthroplasty for Tumour Reconstruction

Overview
Journal Bone Joint J
Date 2021 Aug 2
PMID 34334040
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Rotating-hinge knee prostheses are commonly used to reconstruct the distal femur after resection of a tumour, despite the projected long-term burden of reoperation due to complications. Few studies have examined the factors that influence their failure and none, to our knowledge, have used competing risk models to do so. The purpose of this study was to determine the risk factors for failure of a rotating-hinge knee distal femoral arthroplasty using the Fine-Gray competing risk model.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 209 consecutive patients who, between 1991 and 2016, had undergone resection of the distal femur for tumour and reconstruction using a rotating-hinge knee prosthesis. The study endpoint was failure of the prosthesis, defined as removal of the femoral component, the tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation; major revision (exchange of the femoral component, tibial component, or the bone-implant fixation); or amputation.

Results: Multivariate Fine-Gray regression analyses revealed different hazards for each Henderson failure mode: percentage of femoral resection (p = 0.001) and extent of quadriceps muscle resection (p = 0.005) for overall prosthetic failure; extent of quadriceps muscle resection (p = 0.002) and fixation of femoral component (p = 0.011) for type 2 failure (aseptic loosening); age (p = 0.009) and percentage of femoral resection (p = 0.019) for type 3 failure (mechanical failure); and type of joint resection (p = 0.037) for type 4 (infection) were independent predictors. A bone stem ratio of > 2.5 reliably predicted aseptic loosening.

Conclusion: We identified independent risk factors for overall and cause-specific prosthetic failure after rotating-hinge knee distal femoral arthroplasty using a competing risk Fine-Gray model. A bone stem ratio > 2.5 reliably predicts aseptic loosening. An accurate knowledge of the risks of distal femoral arthroplasty after resection for tumour assists surgical planning and managing patient expectations. Cite this article:  2021;103-B(8):1405-1413.

Citing Articles

Utilization of 3D-Printed Customized Uncemented Stem Prostheses for Revision of Aseptic Loosening in the Distal Femoral Cemented Prostheses: Case Series and Literature Review.

Hou Z, Zheng K, Xu M, Yu X Orthop Surg. 2024; 17(3):801-813.

PMID: 39711270 PMC: 11872351. DOI: 10.1111/os.14331.


Management of Bone Loss in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium.

Sculco P, Flevas D, Jerabek S, Jiranek W, Bostrom M, Haddad F HSS J. 2024; 20(2):141-181.

PMID: 39281983 PMC: 11393633. DOI: 10.1177/15563316231202750.


Limited Revision with a Newly Designed Hinge Device for the Treatment of Mega-Prosthesis Hinge Failure: Two Case Reports.

Zheng K, Yu X, Xu M, Cui H, Zhang J, Wei Y Orthop Surg. 2024; 16(7):1744-1750.

PMID: 38828747 PMC: 11216826. DOI: 10.1111/os.14100.


Satisfactory medium- to long-term outcomes of cemented rotating hinge prosthesis in revision total knee arthroplasty.

Matar H, Bloch B, James P Bone Jt Open. 2023; 4(10):776-781.

PMID: 37839799 PMC: 10577042. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.410.BJO-2022-0032.R1.


Effect of carbon-fiber-reinforced polyetheretherketone on stress distribution in a redesigned tumor-type knee prosthesis: a finite element analysis.

Wu H, Guo Y, Guo W Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023; 11:1243936.

PMID: 37823023 PMC: 10562634. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1243936.


References
1.
Coathup M, Batta V, Pollock R, Aston W, Cannon S, Skinner J . Long-term survival of cemented distal femoral endoprostheses with a hydroxyapatite-coated collar: a histological study and a radiographic follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95(17):1569-75. DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00362. View

2.
Kawai A, Muschler G, Lane J, Otis J, Healey J . Prosthetic knee replacement after resection of a malignant tumor of the distal part of the femur. Medium to long-term results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998; 80(5):636-47. DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199805000-00004. View

3.
Kotz R, Ritschl P, Trachtenbrodt J . A modular femur-tibia reconstruction system. Orthopedics. 1986; 9(12):1639-52. DOI: 10.3928/0147-7447-19861201-07. View

4.
Wilson F, Fajgenbaum D, Venters G . Results of knee replacement with the Walldius and geometric prostheses. A comparative study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980; 62(4):497-503. View

5.
Pala E, Trovarelli G, Angelini A, Ruggieri P . Distal femur reconstruction with modular tumour prostheses: a single Institution analysis of implant survival comparing fixed versus rotating hinge knee prostheses. Int Orthop. 2016; 40(10):2171-2180. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-016-3232-1. View