» Articles » PMID: 34328530

Co-clinical FDG-PET Radiomic Signature in Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-negative Breast Cancer

Overview
Date 2021 Jul 30
PMID 34328530
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: We sought to exploit the heterogeneity afforded by patient-derived tumor xenografts (PDX) to first, optimize and identify robust radiomic features to predict response to therapy in subtype-matched triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) PDX, and second, to implement PDX-optimized image features in a TNBC co-clinical study to predict response to therapy using machine learning (ML) algorithms.

Methods: TNBC patients and subtype-matched PDX were recruited into a co-clinical FDG-PET imaging trial to predict response to therapy. One hundred thirty-one imaging features were extracted from PDX and human-segmented tumors. Robust image features were identified based on reproducibility, cross-correlation, and volume independence. A rank importance of predictors using ReliefF was used to identify predictive radiomic features in the preclinical PDX trial in conjunction with ML algorithms: classification and regression tree (CART), Naïve Bayes (NB), and support vector machines (SVM). The top four PDX-optimized image features, defined as radiomic signatures (RadSig), from each task were then used to predict or assess response to therapy. Performance of RadSig in predicting/assessing response was compared to SUV, SUV, and lean body mass-normalized SUL measures.

Results: Sixty-four out of 131 preclinical imaging features were identified as robust. NB-RadSig performed highest in predicting and assessing response to therapy in the preclinical PDX trial. In the clinical study, the performance of SVM-RadSig and NB-RadSig to predict and assess response was practically identical and superior to SUV, SUV, and SUL measures.

Conclusions: We optimized robust FDG-PET radiomic signatures (RadSig) to predict and assess response to therapy in the context of a co-clinical imaging trial.

Citing Articles

The top 100 most-cited articles on artificial intelligence in breast radiology: a bibliometric analysis.

Singh S, Healy N Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):297.

PMID: 39666106 PMC: 11638451. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01869-4.


Investigating the effects of artificial intelligence on the personalization of breast cancer management: a systematic study.

Sohrabei S, Moghaddasi H, Hosseini A, Ehsanzadeh S BMC Cancer. 2024; 24(1):852.

PMID: 39026174 PMC: 11256548. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12575-1.


Respective contribution of baseline clinical data, tumour metabolism and tumour blood-flow in predicting pCR after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 and Triple Negative breast cancer.

Payan N, Presles B, Coutant C, Desmoulins I, Ladoire S, Beltjens F EJNMMI Res. 2024; 14(1):60.

PMID: 38965124 PMC: 11224181. DOI: 10.1186/s13550-024-01115-4.


Baseline [F]FDG PET/CT and MRI first-order breast tumor features do not improve pathological complete response prediction to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Oliveira C, Oliveira F, Constantino C, Alves C, Brito M, Cardoso F Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(12):3709-3718.

PMID: 38922396 PMC: 11445295. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06815-6.


Deep learning generation of preclinical positron emission tomography (PET) images from low-count PET with task-based performance assessment.

Dutta K, Laforest R, Luo J, Jha A, Shoghi K Med Phys. 2024; 51(6):4324-4339.

PMID: 38710222 PMC: 11423763. DOI: 10.1002/mp.17105.


References
1.
Marusyk A, Janiszewska M, Polyak K . Intratumor Heterogeneity: The Rosetta Stone of Therapy Resistance. Cancer Cell. 2020; 37(4):471-484. PMC: 7181408. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2020.03.007. View

2.
Gillies R, Kinahan P, Hricak H . Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data. Radiology. 2015; 278(2):563-77. PMC: 4734157. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015151169. View

3.
Aerts H, Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S . Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014; 5:4006. PMC: 4059926. DOI: 10.1038/ncomms5006. View

4.
Chen Z, Akbay E, Mikse O, Tupper T, Cheng K, Wang Y . Co-clinical trials demonstrate superiority of crizotinib to chemotherapy in ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer and predict strategies to overcome resistance. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 20(5):1204-1211. PMC: 3947539. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-1733. View

5.
Kim H, Kang H, Shim H, Kim E, Kim J, Kim D . Co-clinical trials demonstrate predictive biomarkers for dovitinib, an FGFR inhibitor, in lung squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2017; 28(6):1250-1259. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx098. View