» Articles » PMID: 34327440

Patterns of Hearing Changes in Women and Men from Denarians to Nonagenarians

Overview
Date 2021 Jul 30
PMID 34327440
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hearing loss needs to be diagnosed and treated early, especially in older individuals, since presbycusis potentially increases the risk of depression and dementia. However, standard data on hearing thresholds across the life-span in Japanese individuals are lacking.

Methods: In a retrospective consecutive sample of 10681 native-Japanese speakers (37.3% men; 10-99 years; left-right hearing threshold difference of <15 dB for all tested pure tones; free of external, middle, or inner ear disease), we determined standard age-decade and sex-specific pure-tone air-conduction (125, 250, 500, 1000, 2000, 4000, and 8000 Hz) hearing threshold norms. The main outcome measures were pure-tone averages for both ears by age-decade and sex.

Findings: For participants in their 20s, hearing thresholds at higher frequencies (>1000 Hz) were significantly worse in men than in women. For participants ≥70 years, hearing thresholds at low frequencies were higher in women. Hearing thresholds at 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz tended to deteriorate, starting in the teenage years through the 50s, with some decades showing significantly worse decline. Sex differences were absent in the youngest and oldest groups.

Interpretation: Standard age- and sex-specific audiometric data reported here for Japanese individuals over nine age-decades are based on the largest dataset analyzed to date. While hearing thresholds of men and women in the very young and the very old age groups were indistinguishable in their cohorts, patterns of hearing changes for other age cohorts differed by direction and sex.

Funding: The authors had no outside funding for this study.

Citing Articles

Hearing loss predictive model in fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva from a national referral center: developing an hearing loss predictive model.

Cacco T, Papa R, Carmisciano L, Bruzzo C, Semino L, Tonelli A JBMR Plus. 2025; 9(4):ziaf029.

PMID: 40060915 PMC: 11890112. DOI: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf029.


Influence of Gaussian White Noise on Medical Students' Capacity to Accurately Identify Pulmonary Sounds.

Razvadauskas H, Razvadauskiene J, Aliulis M, Aliulyte R, Naudziunas A, Paukstaitiene R Noise Health. 2025; 26(123):474-482.

PMID: 39787547 PMC: 11813236. DOI: 10.4103/nah.nah_98_24.


Toward Alleviating the Stigma of Hearing Aids: A Review.

Madara E, Bhowmik A Audiol Res. 2024; 14(6):1058-1074.

PMID: 39727610 PMC: 11673210. DOI: 10.3390/audiolres14060087.


Variants in the AGBL5 gene are responsible for autosomal recessive Retinitis pigmentosa with hearing loss.

Karali M, Garcia-Garcia G, Kaminska K, AlTalbishi A, Cancellieri F, Testa F Eur J Hum Genet. 2024; .

PMID: 39672920 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-024-01768-8.


Advances in Wearable Stethoscope Technology: Opportunities for the Early Detection and Prevention of Cardiovascular Diseases.

Roh K, Awosika A, Millis R Cureus. 2024; 16(12):e75446.

PMID: 39664289 PMC: 11633525. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75446.


References
1.
Brant L, Fozard J . Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging. J Acoust Soc Am. 1990; 88(2):813-20. DOI: 10.1121/1.399731. View

2.
Davis A, Smith P, Ferguson M, Stephens D, Gianopoulos I . Acceptability, benefit and costs of early screening for hearing disability: a study of potential screening tests and models. Health Technol Assess. 2007; 11(42):1-294. DOI: 10.3310/hta11420. View

3.
Nolan L . Age-related hearing loss: Why we need to think about sex as a biological variable. J Neurosci Res. 2020; 98(9):1705-1720. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24647. View

4.
Pronk M, Deeg D, Smits C, van Tilburg T, Kuik D, Festen J . Prospective effects of hearing status on loneliness and depression in older persons: identification of subgroups. Int J Audiol. 2011; 50(12):887-96. DOI: 10.3109/14992027.2011.599871. View

5.
Welch B . The generalisation of student's problems when several different population variances are involved. Biometrika. 2010; 34(1-2):28-35. DOI: 10.1093/biomet/34.1-2.28. View